yes , I can feel this pain, I feel that all this option discord, telegram etc are not much programmable

Twitter Bot which tweets quotes every hour

It was related to programming interview, computing only and there was a very well structured path as well.

Beautiful compilation :)

Hey thanks for this, its really good one , though paid, the one I am trying to retrieve was free.

Btw its not the same, but it is really close to what I am searching and what I have seen , the only diff is the site you gave is language oriented, the one m looking for is totally based on DSA

Sorry not this one, I am aware about the above both, so the site I am finding was just dedicated to data-structure and algorithms , thats it , there was nothing much apart from that.

Thanks for sharing it , really cool one, but

> Framework / Language really doesn't matter that much. Choose what you're comfortable with, "even if it's php."

I think modern php is able to manage almost anything, starting from facebook as well.

Yep! Php ain't all that bad. I'm migrating earlybrd to laravel soon and enjoy it a lot. just poking a bit of fun because nerds like to hate on php.

I have never used Laravel, but I am an avid user of Flask. In fact my current project is built in it. Do you mind expanding on why you're transitioning?

I hope you don't mind me saying, but it sounds like you didn't have the best setup (i.e.: > raw SQL queries with psycopg2). With a couple of packages your environment and dev process would be a lot smoother.

Flask is great and could work fine. I just found that Laravel was easy enough to scaffold things out a lot easier (like user auth). I'm new to web app dev as well and have found MVC and other framework concepts making more since as I develop more in Laravel. SQL queries worked fine for me but a lot of people disagree with doing things that way. In contrast, though, eloquent is much simpler once you learn.

Its an pilot with one religion , we will make it open for all other religions

I mentioned about the title because at the bottom of your website it says: "Hindu Media Wiki is a Resource sharing and discussion site for followers of the Hindu religion and those interested in learning more about Hinduism." This would be a better title in my opinion, regardless the idea you have for all religions is a nice one.

Thanks, yes it would be a good title which I missed it.

I suspect OP's confusion (and mine) stems from the domain name - it singles out a single religion (Hinduism). I'd be interested in knowing how the site will accommodate discussions on other faiths without changing that domain name.

I think its not possible with same domain name so we are looking for alternative domain and will have subdomains for diff religions.

You can suggest some good top level domain name ideas.

theotalk.net is unclaimed at the time of this writing. :)

That's not clear from the website itself - regardless, it would be better to reflect the website as is in the title here.

EDIT - title changed, cheers.

Sure I agree, I edited the title :) It was in hurry actually but the idea is to have it for all religions. Since most of our contributors were from the particular religion we started of with that.

actually r/Hinduism is not focused on strict discussion based on scripture also there are many kind of media formate involved like images,videos etc, for example religious groups have many rules and hierarchy based on scriptures to decide the quality of posts which is not found in r/Hinduism.

What sort of hierarchy?

so thats why we started with the category tree itself.

instead of flat tags, that's one visual difference