Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BLKNSLVR's commentslogin

How many $200/month does the US government cover though? I'd say probably a lot. Especially with how much extra the DoD will pay to get OpenAI to cross it's "red lines" - on day two.

Everyone already knows what he is going to do when it comes to that.

"I do not think that sama should be burned at the stake"

Unless it's lawful?

I seem to be doing more and more illegal things as time passes, whilst not changing my behavior at all.

Curious.


I couldn't have said it better myself. My loved ones don't share my opinion, which makes me wonder if I'm sane or if they're not exercising their freedom.

I've always treated most of those kind of videos as staged. I like the idea that that's how it goes down but, almost because it's cathartic, I don't trust that it's real footage, as opposed to, essentially, short film fiction.

Anyone who does 996 is being exploited, unless they're the actual boss, in which case they're the ones doing the exploiting if they're pushing 996 on their employees.

This is why 996 bosses think AI can replace their employees, because they already see the employees as robots, not humans.


This is a pimple on the arse of said consequence. It's one tiny thing in a chain of many bigger things.

It's magnified because it's right now, but this won't affect midterm results barely a whisker compared to many other daily headlines.

There are no serious enemies to this administration in SV and I can't see this changing that. SV has bent the knee exactly like Anthropic didn't. They're not going to stand up because of this, they've proven they don't have those muscles.


I don't think it's ever been about strong or weak, or at least I don't think that's where the differentiation is. You always want 'strong' government, committed to the things it says it's committed to.

It's more been about the size of the government; that it should do a minimal amount of control (and do it well), but leave a lot of things for "the market to decide".

Having said all that, I think this issue is just tangential to any big/small government ideology. This is a hissy fit about a defence contractor sticking to their agreement where the DoD want to change the agreement in a way that goes against the contractors Mission Statement and/or the US Constitution itself.

The old ideology of the Republicans doesn't mean anything here. This administration is purely about 'give me what I want, now!'.

And it's whims change with the breeze. Do not look for consistency here.


I've only ever used the free plans, but I'd consider a sub with Anthropic now.

What is this "law" you speak of?

I understand 'goals' and 'means to an end', but this concept of "law" evades me.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: