> Amplifiers, Not Substitutes

the kind of heading AI would write..

of course

The PCB images are the, but sadly just images, no privet PCB layout format is provided.

Maybe a network of ppl who can vouch they meet in real life?

I don't know if having your name/ face a secret is still acceptable? Maybe tiers of devs (anon vs other) on that one?

Uh, no it isn't.

Why is an analogy needed? Just engage with what actually happened.

> "but the letter of the law didn't say I couldn't!" doesn't make you any less of a thief.

Yes it does. And it's moot because the apples were offered for free, no restriction on usage.

Did you change the url to "twitter.com/jar.." rather than "x.com/ja.."?

The latter might save a redirect.

It's been repeated many times that the rejection of the Bun PR was unrelated to their AI-policy. It's also not clear they've "fumbled the ball" given how many projects are complaining about slop PRs.

I think it would help if Zig put out a statement on their actual AI policy, regardless of whether they’d be repeating something that should already be known.

As often happens, the online discourse has, for some reason, decided that this was an anti-AI stance, while - as far as I understand - the problem was simply that the PR had problems, which lead to Bun forking Zig.

They did: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/

If they are calling via a business caller ID then what's the problem - just treat the associated business as responsible.

It's as if nothing was learned from AI winter[]! it's obviously a technology dead-end.

[] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter