It was the incessant attempts by Israel to invade Lebanon and the inaction of the Lebanese government but I guess your answer responds to your underlying allegiances.
Because of the constant invasion and denial of recognition of the West Bank and Gaza as Palestinian and after decades of pogroms and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian villages.
Sounds like you already picked a side. And strangely enough its for a place that you have most likely never been before, and even more puzzling to me, its the side that is the enemy of your culture, which I am assuming you live in USA/Europe/West.
Enemy of my culture? Picked a side? Never been there?
I have eyes and I have a heart capable of empathy. I have a belief that all humans deserve wellbeing, even people I disagree and dislike.
Watching a genocide unfold is clearly antithetical to my beliefs, no matter what the culture of the victims is. Watching a genocide unfold and being against it does not require first hand knowledge of the place. And this conflict is not a team sport -- I can be opposed to Hamas AND opposed to the genocide being perpetrated.
you do not seem to have the heart and empathy for the israelis being attacked and killed by rockets and drones and killed in terrorist attacks and seem to be very certain in information you gathered online and not from direct experience. You definitely picked a side - and blaming one side for all evil, especially in this conflict simply shows just how selective your empathy is, again, especially considering You have no personal stakes. you are demonizing a whole nation under deadly attacks and going to great lengths closing your eyes to the suffering of people you demonize
I think you have not been reading my posts where I unambiguously and repeatedly condemn both Hamas and Hezbollah, and consider firing rockets into civilian areas a war crime.
You seem to believe there's a right side and a wrong side to this conflict. I think there are two wrong sides to this conflict, but the scale and magnitude between the two sides is enormous.
I have empathy for all the non combatants here. I don't have empathy for the groups engaged in killing, displacing, torturing, etc.
How many people died from those terrorist attacks and how many innocent Palestinian children were purposely shot in the head? Whose leaders are currently on national TV proclaiming that their main goal in life is ethnic cleansing?
80% of surveyed Israeli Jews agree even partially with the phrase "there are no innocent civilians in Gaza".
over 5000 israelis and under 10 (or I assume 0) innocent palestinian children purposely shot in the head (but yes, in the history of israel there must have been some psychopaths in the army, hopefully punished).
you realize Teheran has a square with a countdown to complete destruction of Israel and they make people chant death to Israel death to America as part of normal culture?
did you survey personally or did Aljazeera do? Liar
Why do you turn this forum into a house of lies? There is a limitless supply of testimonies of Western journalists dating from decades relaying how the IDF purposely shoots children in the head in Gaza and the West Bank. Haaretz has covered it. MSF has covered it. There are testimonies from all over the world. Every single day we have dozens of incidents of West Bank settlers destroying Palestinian villages and they are being recorded by Jewish Israeli activists.
Iranians, believe it or not, have not been in a campaign of ethnic cleansing, unlike Israel which currently destroying literally every single standing building in Gaza and purpusely starving its population, with explicit mentions that Lebanon will follow "the Gaza model".
Don’t know why you’re being downvoted but it’s absolutely true. Crumbling infrastructure is the result of decisions like these where no long term vision for infrastructure exists. The last 5 years of warfare have shown that this is a liability.
That was never mindless if you look at it from the perspective of Cheney's friends at Halliburton. We'd be inclined to think the opposite really if US military absorbs all the risks and costs and they absorb the profits.
If you mean "absolutely foreseen" like "we knew this was a really really bad idea yet Trump still let himself get bamboozled by Netanyahu and now he doesn't know what do", sure, we were all absolutely aware that these were going to be the consequences.
What's naive is to think that this is overplayed when the same events are happening day and day out after Israeli settles continue campaigns of ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. This is just _one_ representative story of dozens that happen every day as reported by many NGOs. This one was merely made viral.
Sorry, I just don't buy the coached words of a 12 year old as categorically truthful. If anything, ethnic cleansing would be a more statistical and thus verifiable claim than the literal anecdote of a child.
Really interesting that out of all the testimonials coming out from Gaza and the West Bank that repeat observable, recorded events over and over again, by people in all sides of the conflict, that you selective choose skepticism about this one as if Hind Rajab didn´t happen.
It's the complete opposite. The objective of type hints is that they're optional precisely because type hints narrow the functionality of the language. And evidenced by the fact that different type checks have different heuristics for determining what is a valid typed program and what isn't, it seems that the decision is correct.
No type system will allow for the dynamism that Python supports. It's not a question of how you annotate types, it's about how you resolve types.
Mollusks in the ocean are producing shells slower because of the increase in carbonic acid. Nighttime temperatures are observably higher in the tropics.
You're say things that even climate denialists aren't claiming are true.
reply