"the obligations of those without Capital is to write laws that demand the benefits of Capital be shared with all."

How do you propose they do that exactly?

I think he means the jobs that haven't yet been automated: plumbers, electricians, auto mechanics, pipe fitters, dry wall layers, etc.

Not really a bold claim. The scientific consensus is that intelligence is a highly polygenic and heritable trait, with genetic factors accounting for 50%-80% of the variations in intelligence. The rest is environmental (prenatal care, education, nutrition, lack of exposure to toxins like lead, etc.)

I think that writers may stop using "It's not x, it's y" analogies in their writings because every time they do, someone calls it out for being AI. Same with "Em Dashes" and such.

Total GDP increasing isn't a good measure of economic growth or productivity because it doesn't distinguish between productive value creation and money just changing hands. If I cut your hair and charge $50 and you cut my hair and charge $50 then $100 is added to the GDP. Sure, value is created by the transaction, but value would be created if no money changed hands at all thus not even affecting the GDP! GDP can also rise even as most people are doing poorly. A billionaire buying a superyacht adds the same amount to the GDP as 500 families buying their first home. You can have a growing GDP even in a society where the top .1% have 99% of the wealth, but that's not a society I'd want to live in.

I read the whole thing; it's definitely not AI slop. A few sentences taken out of an hour long read that are commonly used by AI doesn't mean the article was composed by AI. You'll find similar artifacts in any longer published work, including those published prior to AI.

I don't think [1] is 100% accurate.

What part of it isn't accurate? They're the top commenter and said exactly what I stated

In my limited experience, using LLMs to code up things unrelated to LLMs (robotics for instance) is significantly less productive than using LLMs to code up things related to LLMs. It works, just not very well and requires a lot more leg work on the user end than in other areas.

Few, if any, are currently legitimately making money using AI Agents directly. Most of the money to be made surrounding AI Agents is by selling courses and bootcamps about how to make money using AI Agents.

If only I had seen that before somewhere https://youtu.be/biYciU1uiUw

Right. If you are wealthy enough to go retire and live off interest, but STILL choose to work for a company you morally disagree with...then what sort of person are you?