Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | IAMMidway's commentslogin

Your answer is a non sequitor.

The shutdown of the nuclear reactors was an ideologically driven decision by the last government and the last government before that.

Energy prices are extremely high which damages the German economy. Renewables depend on massive subsidies that Germany can't afford less and less.

Oh and Gas: Switching supplier from Russia to Qatar wasn't a brilliant decision. You just replace an adversarial supplier with another one. Thats really no reason to pat yourself on the shoulder. Its an extremely short term decision.


You are using the word "ideology". That isn't the hallmark of good arguments. But may be we can agree onto that the current government is trying to fix all the problems caused by the previous one. The problem wasn't shutting down the mostly old nuclear reactors, the problem was curbing the ramp up of renewables. But fortunately, the current government is fixing that. Which brings energy prices down and while currently we are hit by many factors, quickly can become a big support for Germanys economy. It might be expensive leading a trend, but it does pay of long term.


It seems they don't want to deliver the best technical solution for their customers.


Yeah, but... why? It should be easyer and cheaper to do so. I fail to imagine how much more value they can extract by refusing to use this. What? 50 more measly bucks per car? Obviously, there's something I'm not getting, would love for someone to illuminate me.

Are they imagining there is more value in this than there is? Am I simply underestimating the value potential for having their own thing? Do they want to protect their customer's data? Do they think that NOT having it somehow is a positive differentiator? Do they not know how to make it happen? I am stumped.


You think the Chinese government gives a damn about a sad and dying planet?

They should punish billionaires that cross the people, not the government.


Becaus it shows the ECHR is not a serious institution if PR-tricks like using "seniors" to bring forth your case helps you win.

The ECHR needs to be abolished and Switzerland needs to leave this court.


So this would be a worthwhile case if a youthful physicist was bringing the complaint?

As per the article, they are arguing that seniors are particularly affected by climate change due to heat waves, and these are causing deaths.

The 2022 heatwaves had hundreds of deaths attributed to climate change in Switzerland: https://lenews.ch/2023/07/08/climate-change-behind-60-percen...


The issue with people dying from heat waves has nothing to do with climate change.

The issue is that Switzerland outlawed air conditioning for private homes (still allowed in shopping centres though!)


Show me that law, because as far as I can tell, that's complete nonsense.

I know of a bunch of people who legally purchased and installed aircon in their homes.


It might vary by canton, I’m in Zürich.

https://archive.is/7g3A9

Yeah you can buy the mobile AC unit, but none of the new-builds in the past 10+ years come with a built-in (fixed) unit.


Its incredible to me that Google can't figure stuff like this out.


Considering how SF manages other stuff, where is the optimism coming from that they will manage this well? Genuine question.


Seems like the first prima facie good idea in a while, I'm wondering how they will screw it up.


SF is probably the second worst managed organization I interact with on a daily basis.

PGE is the worst.


Seems really random to ban just one company. The article refuse to explain why this exact company and why not others. What are the rules?


It's in the article "Since 2021, the ecommerce giant has failed to attend three meetings with the employment and social affairs committee"

The quote from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39529974 might be more clear "The move comes after Amazon’s repeated refusal to attend hearings in the European Parliament on working conditions in Amazon warehouses."


Yes they did. I miss them. But thats creative destruction.

Nokia tried to do everything and ended up doing nothing. They could not compete with the joint assault by iPhone and Android.


Or by Microsoft.

Nokia never understood the less-is-more thing that Apple are so good at. Hundreds of phones and an overcomplicated OS wuth political and technical problems - Symbian - were the result, not the cause, of a company that lacked focus and direction.


It's interesting that Microsoft never succeeded with a smartphone, given that their other hardware products enjoy a decent reputation (keyboards, mice, tablets); I suspect it's because of the software side - stuck with the desktop metaphor and windows, which makes no sense on smartphones.


> windows, which makes no sense on smartphones.

The last version, the one on the Lumias, was actually quite OK on a phone from all I've heard -- and living in Finland, I knew more than a few people who used those back in the day.

That's preciely why Windows 8 sucked so much on the desktop; it was intended to have as much as possible of the look-and-feel of Windows Phone. Windows 8 sucked on computers; apparently not so much on phones.


At the time, Microsoft's software development was a bit of mess. But Windows Phone didn't have a desktop metaphor. Recently I had the opportunity to try one that was sitting in desk for a few years and it was pretty interesting and snappy. But they redesigned their mobile OS so many times, had no good developer experience, and came in late enough that it was all doomed.


Symbian was such a strange thing, from its history to dominance to irrelevant. A real outgrowth of 90s software culture.


Joint assault of iPhone, Android and hostile takeover (intended or not!) by Microsoft.


Genuine question: What is category defining about Google Calender? Or even good? In my experience it lacks a lot of features and is kind of clunky.


I worked at roughly 10 companies in my life. Most either used Outlook/Office or Gmail/Calendar/Drive. Personally I hate the Microsoft office productivity stack, and on the other hand, I love using the Google stack, including Calendar.


Different strokes for different folks. I don’t like google calendar and prefer outlook’s. It’s probably the only part of office except Excel that I actually think works well.

Not perfectly, I’d still like a good calendar based around sharing and collab, but the best out there.

I think we need a good decentralized calendar that treats all calendars as peers. Outlook and google treat a single server as being the authority and everything has to go to those servers for actions. I’d rather see something like a calendar blob for individuals that gets sent around and rehosted lots of places like git. Or at least the availability. It’s still funny to me how hard it is to tell someone off server what your availability is.


There’s nothing wrong with you preferring one service over another, but the question was what makes Google Calendar “category defining”.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: