Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more IncreasePosts's commentslogin

What? Women are much more sympathetic figures when it comes to crime and punishment. And there are 10x more men in prison in america than women. If you were trying to "introduce" some nefarious law enforcement system to the US you would use it on undesirable men first (drug addicts and gang members)


In my experience prompting llms to be critical leads then to imagine issues, or to bike shed


I noticed when I ask it to find something to improve in a project, that certain frivolous topics would arise regularly. I now use their appearance as a sign that there is nothing meaningful to improve.


Maybe unlock means "recognize and solve a problem with an order of magnitude fewer tokens than the first time you did it". The same way humans might spend a lot of time thinking about a certain problem and various ways to solve it, but once they go through that process, and then recognize it again, they don't need to go to the same process and jump right to the solution.


Someone would need to take the opposite side of that bet. And who would do that knowing someone might try to assassinate him in order to win that bet?


In this scenario, that would be the people paying for the assassination. The people who want it to happen bet that it won't. The people who want to do it bet that it will. The net result is that if one of the people who bet on it happening makes it happen, they are being paid by the people betting against it, in a plausibly deniable way.

A country leader seeing someone suddenly take out a $50 million position on them not being assassinated is not the $50 million vote of confidence a naive read on the market might indicate, it's a $50 million payout to the assassin. Albeit inefficiently so, since others can take the other side of the bet and do nothing. But the deniability may be worth it.


What's even more interesting is when you consider that A) it doesn't have to be one person taking out a large position, it can be multiple people, over time, and B) the assassin doesn't have to be known or confirmed ahead of time, if someone decides their "reserve price" has been met, all they have to do to receive a payout is place the appropriate bet before performing the act.

The end result is a combination of Kickstarter and Doordash for targeted homicide.


> The end result is a combination of Kickstarter and Doordash for targeted homicide.

or kidnappers. Someone could take the opposite side, kidnap the individual and guarantee their survival for the year. When time is up they just dump them in the street and collect the bet.


I'm not sure there's any deniability in placing the "won't be assassinated" bet, when you could equally state it as "I will pay $1M to whoever accepts this bet and assassinated this person"

Anyways, how exactly is this assassin going to collect on their bet? I'm pretty sure law enforcement will be looking into the fact that somebody place that bet and then shortly after, the assassination happened.


This could make for fun anti-life insurance.

"I bet I won't die this year."

The only life insurance you get to collect on while you're alive.


That's more of an orthographic problem than a language problem.


LSD and hallucinogenic mushrooms aren't addictive and aren't legal. Cigarettes and alcohol are addictive and are legal.


I thought the same thing. I took solace in the fact that it may be appealed, and that I suspect lawyers and taxes will take a large chunk out of the settlement


Park your aircraft in hangars. And hope you hid your tracks well enough once the generals start eyeing their almost expired bunker busters with a twinkle in their eye


No, he hasn't been saying that, despite what you may have read in a random reddit comment. In the 90s he was saying 3-5 years. In 2010 it was 1-2 years.

The first time any kind of claim measured in weeks was immediately before Rising Lion last year, and guess what, the IAEA agreed with him.


In 2015 he said weeks. I think we can agree a few weeks passed before that and bombing Iran ten years later.

https://youtube.com/shorts/jlqXOwYfpdQ?is=woFU_DlsW3Eb5NYd


I think we can agree that being weeks away from having enough fissile material for a nuke is different from being weeks away from having a nuke. Unless you think you just get your fissile material and then pop it in the next day


What?

A job is a mutually beneficial agreement between two parties. Either side can generally sever the agreement if it's not viewed as beneficial.

Owning things like houses and companies is more about the compact between people and the government. People are entitled to "own shit", because that's how our government is set up.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: