While I am not defending Molekule, both the BBB and Consumer Reports act based upon money generated from competitive companies. They are not unbiased, and have found to be biased on multiple occasions.
I've been an "Election Judge" twice in Chicago. I administered my polling location twice. After voting ends, we physically collect the votes and transport them by our own vehicles to a polling location to be counted.
Which proves that "votes have to be transported to be counted" is not some inevitable byproduct of the paper-voting process as the parent made it sound like.
So, how many agents are we talking about here? How are they counted at the location you too them to? Two easy targets to identify.
I'm not claiming they are impossible to harden. Just not as easy as people are claiming. And super expensive. Such that if you were truly intent to defrauds place, you would focus on poor sections first.
And our best method of defense is probably our extensive polling tests nowadays. The more we have, the more corroborating evidence we have to an outcome. This protects both forms of counting.
It's one or two rats chewing trough there, once the hole is in, the other rats will just use it without having to chew any of the plastic.
But now you have literally toxic garbage bins, plastic waste is already hard enough to get rid off, making it toxic certainly wouldn't make that any easier.
Those toxins would then filter up and down the food chain. Surely there are many better ways to combat rats than introducing poisons into the environment.
That's actually not a bad idea. Only problem is that one rat's going to get birth control drugs and get his fill of trash. All of the other rats don't need to chew through the can after the first one's made the hole for them.
