Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Terretta's commentslogin

How does this site's home page not have a "what this looks like" anywhere?

Seven years... Where's yours?

// If there is an example and I can't find it, might as well not be there.

// If you won't show yours, why would I show mine?


On the contrary, commit your code to your GitHub repo, triggering Xcode cloud build to take it from there, build, test, deploy to TestFlight or store.

Found a bug while backpacking Sardinia? Edit the GitHub repo source on your phone, commit... hey, new build shipped.

See the App Store Connect mode: https://developer.apple.com/xcode-cloud/


As I said, instead of providing tools, Apple locks you into a shitty GUI application. Thank you for giving another example.

> triggering Xcode cloud build

So my options are a 40gb compilation runtime, or a cloud build that bills me by the hour to avoid the 40gb compilation runtime.

You gotta hand it to Apple, any other audience would just call this "enshittification" and be done with it.


Ergonomics studies back in the day demonstrated amber beats green. Our shop spent extra for amber CRTs over green.

On MacOS Terminal, edit the Homebrew profile and set Text and Bold Text to Apple color Orange, consider setting Selection to Apple color Green and Cursor to Block, Blink, and Apple color Yellow.


You can use the +label method on M365 work accounts, like first.last+label@workdomain.com

Outlook rules match on them too, for rules.


Insecure is a curious word as it entangles with what is or isn't known, more than informs about design.

A different way to put it is GCP architecture has made different tradeoffs. For example favoring operability over confidentiality*, or scalability over integrity.

This makes sense from its mono-tenant engineering origins. Those were the right calls. Google exported SRE not SecEng.

Frankly, for most cloud customers, it's what they need.

---

* Take this break glass process. It arguably shouldn't be possible. If clients need their CSP to be "NSL proof", unable to leak corporate info responding to a national security letter (or any less obligatory rationale) without the corporation knowing, GCP is not their cloud. CSPs mostly consider it more difficult than it's worth to design a cloud offering that can be proven unable to provide a client's data. On the contrary, customers yell if CSP can't restore lost data, like Apple users yell if Apple can't restore iCloud. iCloud Advanced Security is what happens when you build clients the choice -- witness the warnings.

Support drives design choices, not security.


Hate to break it to ya, you picked an emerging hyperscaler:

https://www.sdxcentral.com/news/cloudflare-has-the-edge-in-h...


i guess the difference is i chose my hyperscalers à la carte instead of getting the all-in-one bundle. at least when cloudflare breaks something i can still ssh into my linode and debug it directly

Linode is also owned by Akamai...

Or they did, but they needed/wanted to do something else more.

That's usually based on either (a) more perspective, or (b) lack of foundational depth.


Maybe they didn’t have sufficient visibility at the ground level to make proper decisions.

Texture was incredible.

Apple News remained fantastic until renewal of agreements when publishers demanded rights to insert additional ads.

Apple can't not have premium sources in there, so...


content creator is new speak

people with something to share, people with something to say, who share and say it because they want to

that's how pamphleteers worked, that's how the Internet worked

at scale, static (CMS-managed) information sites cost effectively nothing even for arbitrary amounts of traffic, and smoothed across a range of people sharing stuff, it approaches zero per person

publishing used to be free with your ISP, and edge CDN used to be (and still is) free to a point (an incredibly high volume point) as well

having people pay something nominal to say things instead of pay far too much in attention-distraction or money to consume things, would put this all back the right way round


I couldn’t disagree with this more if I tried. The biggest benefit of the internet is to make it easier to talk to each other and share ideas. Putting financial gates in front of that ability is hot garbage.

Also, I agree that the platforms and paradigms we have are fucked up, but do believe that people who put work into making something deserve to charge for it if there are folks who’d pay.


kerning, and it's been 'smart' since Linotype machines if not before.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: