Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more UndefinedRef's commentslogin

That convicted drug dealer or smuggler Greenland guy with the maga cap in the video he shared encapsulates this very well.


I remember having the 1541 disk drive for my C64 play tunes.


I remember this too, it was real, but it also apparently could damage the drive lol


That truck always reminds me of that Simpsons episode, where Homer designs a car.


Thats some top 1% shit


Yet his heroes make more per hour than this insanely rich person made in his entire career.


From my limited experience, this is the standard Silicon Valley mindset.


I wouldnt drive a Tesla if it was free.


Ok, but please don't post unsubstantive comments here.


After owning a Model Y for a year I have to say -- it's the best car I've ever had. Comfortable ride, the visibility with the cameras is great, amazing all-weather traction. It's freakin' fast. The voice-to-navigate works nearly 99% of the time which, given my experiences with Alexa and Siri, is quite impressive.

All the usual EV caveats apply though. Being able to charge at home is a must. Living in a cold weather state is probably not advised. Multi-state road trips are doable but not recommended; it's just too much of a hassle. Keep a gas car for that. And I still don't trust any driving assist more advanced than enhanced cruise control.

I have no emotional response to Musk so that doesn't color my opinion of the car.


> it's the best car I've ever had

That's going to be true for many car sales. People don't usually downgrade on cars, and there is real progress on car features over a typical period between buying cars. It'll be especially true if a brand like Tesla where most if their sales are coming from people who previously owned significantly cheaper cars.


It's also just standard human psychology after you've spent $40k, advertisers have relied on this for decades.


norway was almost full EV purchases last year. cold weather issues are totally exacerbated.

also, i drove in a tesla, and the number of cameras doing weird and confusing things with bad perspectives weirded me out. i don't know why, but it just felt wrong, and too much information on the screen too. like they tried to do every technical thing just because.

and if you don't think musk is a danger, idk what to tell you. either you support him or you just don't care about human life.


Norway is also less than half the size of Texas with even that population heavily concentrated in the south near the ports.

North America is .... Big. Like really big. So discussions around vehicle range might be dramatically differently depending on location.

Not saying you are wrong though just something to consider


The parts of Norway where most of the populations lives have warmer winters than most of the northern US states except the ones near the Pacific ocean.


The "being able to charge at home" is why I recently purchased an petrol powered Subaru.

But every online comment and guide telling people to simply install a charger in their driveway assumes a certain amount of privilege, and I feel a lot of this discussion just assumes everyone has that privilege. I'm currently living in an apartment, my underground car park has no power runs anywhere near my car. Before that I lived in a rented house, and getting permission to install anything that required drilling a single hole would have been a non starter.


this is more of a problem with the power of landlords and bad regulations for the average person. in europe in a lot of countries renters have the right to make changes and in some even the right to have EV chargers installed


On impulse a few years ago I decided to drive our Model 3 on a multi-state road trip that'd take us through Colorado, Utah, Nevada, California, up through Oregon, then back to Colorado instead of our perfectly fine ICE car. I use the car mostly for local, sub-50 mile drives, which it excels at, and never considered it as a road trippable car (less because of the powertrain and more because of lack of road trips in general).

I have zero regrets about picking the EV at the last minute, and would 100% make this choice again. I assumed, like I imagine most people do, that having to wait while charging would be a deal breaker. I quickly learned to love the wait though. It makes long road trips so much more comfortable when you take a break every 6 hours that's long enough to go for a walk or take a nap.

I could employ that strategy with an ICE car, sure, but if I compare my ICE to my EV, the differences between the two in terms of comfort, functionality, and cost of operating put the EV way out ahead of the ICE.


> it's the best car I've ever had

What other cars you had before?


None of your positives resonate.

I'll never buy a Tesla. A decade ago I was a huge fan.

Most likely option at the moment is the Hyundai ioniq 5 N ... not only a better drivers car than anything Tesla have ever put out, but I don't have to swallow the Musk emotional tax or have his smell lingering over the purchase ...

I'll ... never ... buy ... a ... Tesla.

The brand is over.


I was just arguing with someone about this over the holidays when they could not believe I would pass up on a Tesla even if it was free.

Forget about Elon being and the company culture, there's practical reasons for me not wanting to own one of these even though I could afford one.

Living in cold Canadian province, there would be no upside to owning one of these. Just more hassle. If given one I'd sell it probably for less than the market value just so I can get a more practical hybrid or gas guzzler car.

That's not to say that there aren't other Teslas around here, but for me it just would not be worth the hassle.


As a former Tesla Model 3 owner (it got totaled from getting rear-ended) and now own a Ford Mach-E as well as a Toyota RAV-4 Prime (plugin hybrid), yeah I totally agree. Cold weather is the worst for EV cars. You have to spend so much energy keeping the batteries warm on top of spending more energy to keep the cabin comfortable.

Heck even the RAV-4 is a problem because it uses a heat pump instead of resistance heating, which means it can't heat the cabin in full EV mode when the temp is < 20F, so I force it into gas mode to stay warm on those days.

Not sure how you fix this problem, other than just continuing to improve energy density in batteries to where you don't think about it anymore.


There's no reason you should be getting downvoted for this, and I say this as someone who loves their Model 3. You're stating a fact about yourself that is, at the very least, loosely relevant to the posted article.

It's like a bunch of people who are a fan of the color yellow got mad when you said you're not a fan of yellow.


Assuming it's due to Elon. Any moral qualms driving a VW, Mercedes, BMW, or Toyota?

Each has taken, uh, far more aggressive actions in their respective pasts.


[flagged]


Counterpoint, I’m not convinced those companies were sufficiently punished for their past transgressions, should have ongoing levies/tariffs to repay the lend lease programs that rebuilt Europe.

Attempting to draw a line between what Germans actually did in the early 1900s to what you think Elon “would do if he were in charge” is the unserious part.

My only point is that the virtue signaling over Elon is quite petty.


If only people had this much vitriol for companies with non-publicly evil ceos.


Have to start somewhere.


Red meat does make you fart more though. I cant imagine thats healthy for people around you.


So Barcelona homelessness is going up and Los Angeles homelessness is going down? The only reasonable conclusion must be that the homeless are relocating from Los Angeles to Barcelona. It is only a question of time then.


I am getting Jehovah's Witness vibes from it.


There is a US ton? My God...


To be perfectly fair, it was a little strange for the metric system to have a "ton" unit in the first place. Much like a foot or a cup, it's one of those units the metric system is trying to replace, but rather than use megagrams or something else perfectly sensible within the system they already created, they added to the confusion by defining yet another "ton" close enough to the historical units of the same name.


Older people in certain parts of France still use pound ("livre") to mean 500g. Pint ("pinte") for 500ml is more common.


it's because "megagram" and "milligram" are a hassle. With the added bonus of mm/MM being used to abbreviate millions, I'm personally very grateful for tonnes.


The SI unit of measure is the Kilogram, not the gram. Therefore they ought to be using the kilokilogram KKg, not the Mg.


Just because the definition is based on 1000 of the base unit doesn't mean the prefixes start being weird.


Not sure what you mean, kg is the base unit. /s

>The SI comprises a coherent system of units of measurement starting with seven base units, which are the second (symbol s, the unit of time), metre (m, length), kilogram (kg, mass), ampere (A, electric current), kelvin (K, thermodynamic temperature), mole (mol, amount of substance), and candela (cd, luminous intensity).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units


What does it actually mean for the base unit to be the kilogram, as opposed to the gram, now that they're defined in terms of fundamental constants?


It means if you are using SI units "The kilogram is defined by setting the Planck constant h to 6.62607015×10−34 J⋅s (J = kg⋅m2⋅s−2), given the definitions of the metre and the second."

and gram is some random word you made up, with no definition under SI.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units


The gram is indeed defined by SI to be 1/1000th of a kilogram, it's not a random word I made up.

There is no logical difference between the definition you gave, and an alternative definition that says "the gram is defined by setting the Planck constant h to 6.62607015×10−31 J⋅s (J = g⋅m2⋅s−2), given the definitions of the metre and the second", and then defining 1 kg = 1000 g. Which is why I'm asking what this distinction actually means, if anything.

It meant something that feels more real when the kilogram was defined as the mass of a physical reference kilogram object in a vault in Paris, but that changed a few years ago.


the SI unit for kilogram is kg and not Kg


Huh. It looks goofy but it would sidestep the overloaded mm problem.


> gram

Don't you mean a millikilogram (mkg)?


There's the metric tonne 1000kg, the US short ton 2000lbs and the US long ton 2240lbs(1016kg) also known as imperial ton. I started calling the metric tonne a megagram because I got tired of trying to figure out if it was short, long or metric I was dealing with


The bane of all engineers having to do unit conversions and asking clarifying questions around what type of ton/tonne.


When is the long ton ever used, or is it just historical? I've only ever heard of the 2000lb variety my entire life.


This is from a web site that's been around since the Web 1.0 era: https://www.ibiblio.org/units/dictT.html#ton


oh there is a short ton, a long ton, a metric ton. the normal ton in the US is "short ton" which is 2,000 lbs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ton

we also often encounter a "f*ck ton" or even a "metric f*ck ton". these are usually informal units related to the number of things (especially annoying things) rather than strictly weight.


Yes, many of us Americans wish we would adopt the metric system.


You did. All your (USA) units use metric then are converted to US measurements. The US inch is officially 25.4mm exactly.

https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/si-units-length


Yup. And more things are SI units every day.

I use them most of time now. We are getting there slowly.


Wrapped in ham to fool the masses.


Lol, sure.

I just made sure I did my homework so I can operate with anyone.

And it was huge. I have few worries.


And an imperial ton, which is different again.


So 201 trillion baud with 4-QAM modulation..


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: