Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | anotheraccount9's commentslogin

With the amount of crap and complexity we now have online, I miss gopher and well arranged text files.


Could you use a meta field from the object and save the hash in it, running a compare from it?


I recall listening to a cassette that would go through the alphabet, like a song. I tried hard, but never really got the hang out of it. But this time, Morsle would build the bridge more easily.


Upon registering for an account on Clicked.com to access intro cybersecurity courses, I encountered a field inquiring about my sexual orientation. I'm uncertain as to why Clicked.com would collect such data. I wonder if this is a growing trend among career-oriented online platforms (or anything common really).

Is this asked for diversity and inclusion purposes? Are they simply collecting data to resell or marketing purpose? What is your take on it?


It seems an irrelevant data point to me. There's no obvious reason they'd need to know that in order to provide educational services.

I'd leave that unanswered. If that's not possible and I wanted to use the service badly enough, I'd lie in the most humorous manner I could in my response to it.


How could it be beneficial for diversity and inclusion purposes?


Yes, and it's not possible to delete the account (or association with).


A very interesting project. Btw, I could not find a way to delete my account when created. I've also found that the generated report is very generic and quickly goes outside the actual question or specific theme/keywords used.

A final point, the notice states that "The risks associated with this study are minimal. Study data will be stored securely, in compliance with Stanford University standards, minimizing the risk of confidentiality breach." When I use STORM, I can see other people's request. Are they supposed to be confidential?


I recall a quote from Mr. Gaiman:

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” ― Neil Gaiman, Coraline


I love that quote too! I have it from the introduction, I believe, to Smoke and Mirrors:

>Fairy tales, as G. K. Chesterton once said, are more than true. Not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be defeated.

The corresponding original Chesterton quote is supposedly/apocryphally:

>Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed.

I like the original for the "children already know" portion, but I prefer Gaiman's for lyricism and, perhaps ironically given TFA, saying "defeated" instead of "killed."

At any rate, Chesterton didn't say it in so many words. There's some back-and-forth noted here, seems like it's oft-misquoted—<https://www.tumblr.com/neil-gaiman/101407141743/every-versio...>—with a longer version here: <https://saveversusallwands.blogspot.com/2016/05/tracking-bac...>.


Speaking of Gaiman, and fairy tales, I'll always recommend Snow, Glass, Apples (1994).


Here's a door: [#]


Not saving or updating well? Can't find updated result in table.


Sounds like the Equifax breach response ;) nothing to worry I guess


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: