I am curious if it reuses the LLM across all tabs, hard to imagine most machines can boot up 1-2 of any 4gb model unless its a more powerful system.

I think it obviously will, what would be the benefit to spinning up more than one copy?

It should only need to load one copy of the weights, but each tab/site will need a separate context and KV cache.

For a time period I worked for a pharmacy management company that offered both in patient and out patient cost reduction.

The model we operated on was we kept 50% of all cost savings that we attained for the hospital or health system, on a multi-year engagement. This was just supply chain management, cost optimization, manufacturer relations, pharmacy changes etc. No change in patient care.

The hospitals saved money, we made money, everyone left happy.

The types of deals from the article are more or less what happens when the leadership at a hospital gets bribed at golf, hire some consultant to come in and fire people and not hold anyone accountable for any negative outcomes.

I will never understand why any organization would sign a deal with a consultant and not require an outcome by the end of the engagement (in this case, cost savings). You are quite literally signing up to burn money.

I rarely see #3 yield better solutions, it's usually better to collaborate as a team on requirements and gotchas, but let one person own implementation.

But both backend and front-end? Do everyone have to be full stack?

Article is incredibly fear mongering.

Twice in my career the owners of a company have wanted to sue competitors for stealing their "product" after poaching our staff.

Each time, the lawyers came in and basically told us that suing them for copyright is suicide, will inevitably be nearly impossible to prove, and money would be better spent in many other areas.

In fact, we ended up suing them (and they settled) for stealing our copyrighted clinical content, which they copied so blatantly they left our own typos and customer support phone number in it.

Go ahead, try to sue over your copyrighted code, 10 years and 100M later you will end up like Google v Oracle. What if the code is even 5% different? What about elements dictated by external constraints; hardware, industry standards, common programming practices, these aren't copyrightable.

Then you have merger doctrine, how many ways can we really represent the same basic functions?

Same goes with the copyleft argument, "code resembling copyleft" is incredibly vague, it would need to be verbatim the code, not resembling. Then you have the history of copyleft, there have been many abuses of copyleft and only ~10 notable lawsuits. Now because AI wrote it (which makes it _even harder_ to enforce), we will see a sudden outburst of copyleft cases? I doubt it.

Ultimately anyone can sue you for any reason, nothing is stopping anyone right now from suing you claiming AI stole their copyleft code.

its the todomvc of ai user. i made one for myself too. I try not to tell anyone about it .

The issue making Claude just not do any work was infuriating to say the least. I already ran at medium thinking level so was never impacted, but having to constantly go "okay now do X like you said" was annoying.

Again goes back to the "intern" analogy people like to make.

"Billionaires run hit piece of anything that tries to limit their power - more at 11"

Every resume I get now is a 90%+ match and then you interview them and it's clear they don't know anything claimed on the resume.

Do not use these, I can smell AI resumes from a million miles away and instantly discard them.

Best advice I have for people is hand write your resume in a visibly clean layout, and tailor it to the job. Do not use bots either because they make dumb mistakes like leaving markdown in, or submitting 15 seconds after the posting comes online.

I am 90% sure it's looking at month long usage trends now and punishing people who utilize 80%+ week over week. It's the only way to explain how some people burn through their limit in an hour and others who still use it a lot get through their hourly limits fine.

It's hard to say. Admittedly I'm a heavy user as I intentionally cap out my 5x plan every week - I've personally found that I get more usage being on older versions of CC and being very vigilant on context management. But nobody can say for sure, we know they have A/B test capabilities from the CC leaks so it's just a matter of turning on a flag for a heavy user.

Most cities are spending 9-10 figures on Police staff, and somehow are understaffed?

We simply aren't getting effective policing, and technology isn't the solution.

Reality is cops have become police report writers, traffic accident helpers, and domestic abuse arbiters, that is over half the job.

Law enforcement has also burned its goodwill with the public, making everything harder.

I agree with everything you say; my "police departments are understaffed" is too generic, and might be better stated as "too few resources are devoted to traditional beat policing." Which isn't to say that the other things are unnecessary or pointless, but it's a different set of skills.