I picked up French to a fairly fluent level back when I was a Mormon missionary in about 6 months time. Being completely immersed (living in France, speaking/reading it daily) in the language was definitely a boon to learning it. Nothing I did in high school or college even approached that level.
Tragedy that this has happened. That being said, I'm not sending mine back. I've had it for 5 years since our first was born and my third uses it regularly now.
The babies don't sleep in it during the night. I buckle them in and I use my foot to help soothe them to sleep next to me while I work at my desk. If they sleep in it, I'm awake and alert and with them.
We had one child who had acid reflux which doctors suggest putting them on an incline, so we had them sleep in there a few years ago before they could roll.
Hopefully a safer equivalent comes out for future parents.
Yeah I get a feeling people were using these to kind of get out of soothing the baby at night. People were putting their baby in it and like walking away or going back to bed.
The Snoo I think is what most people want, but it's pretty expensive. But you can put the baby down, restrain them properly and then walk away or go to bed.
I don't think you meant it this way, but just a note: it's not selfish for parents to prioritize getting some sleep for themselves at night. It is not good (or safe) for anyone if all the care providers are too sleep deprived to function.
Cosleeping solves both problems. A sober adult will not roll over onto the baby and a mother can sleep through even feeds. Around month three of our first child my wife commented that it was amazing our daughter was sleeping through the night without feeding. But she’s just fuss a little and my wife would roll over and feed her on demand without waking up. It was so easy for both of us.
This has happened. Some people are just very deep sleepers. We’ve resorted to co-sleeping on occasion, but I’m not about to pretend that I feel great about it.
I have various other sleep problems, but fortunately none of them are caused by/cause me to move while asleep, not even so much as rolling onto my side.
But a great many people are not so perfectly immobile, sober or not, and if you haven't had a problem with rolling off a sleeping surface or breaking things by moving in your sleep, you likely won't consider it a risk.
Co-sleeping is basically at the very top of the list of things "they" say YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER DO, OR YOU ARE A TERRIBLE PARENT. So I don't think its fair to recommend it as an alternative to pretty much any other sleep contraption.
Worth noting that the AAP recommends against cosleeping. Cosleeping proponents like to point out that it is not very risky after you account for factors like alcohol use. But I think "not very risky" could also describe this rocker that's been recalled.
Co-sleeping is strongly advised against in many countries. Don't do it. If you really subscribe to all that attachment parenting stuff, get one of those cots you can put next to your own bed with one side of the cot open towards you.
(I'm a parent of a two month old in the Netherlands.)
Yes, this is the safest option because of how much it helps with sleep and how much breastfeeding it facilitates. The (sober) mother effectively cannot roll on the baby.
Pediatric associations mostly don’t like it because it seems improper or too slum-like to share a bed with a baby. The opposition to cosleeping isn’t based on actual relative danger or long-term outcomes.
Keep in mind how many mothers there are, and how many of those rare incidents had extenuating circumstances (substances, atypical neurology in the mother.) Keep in mind how easy and cheap it is today to extend the width of a bed with an attachment.
I know that the downvotes come from people who think of mothers sleeping with their children as poor trash—it’s a seriously outdated view that hurts the child.
You're right, however there is an accessory you can buy that attaches to the legs and adds a slight (8-10cm) incline. We used that with our daughter up until 5.5 months.
As a software engineer in the "Silicon Slopes," I can say that we get multiple offers almost constantly for companies throughout the area. There is enough tech here to keep people employed where they want to be making the money they want to make.
When I was living in France and Switzerland free refills were basically unheard of. About the only place that I ever found that had free refills was IKEA.
I think perhaps it worked as intended right? The goal seems to be to keep traffic free flowing in the lane.
> Tolls for the Express Lanes are dynamic, meaning they change periodically based on real-time traffic conditions to keep the Lanes free-flowing.
> However, rates may rise significantly above the typical range for periods of time in the event of unusually heavy congestion or a specific event like a traffic accident or lane(s) closure.
So because the trucks were slowing things down the price raised deterring more vehicles from entering and slowing this down more. It makes sense to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
