Lemoney | Full Stack RoR Web Developer | Rio de Janeiro - Brazil, Miami - FL - USA | Full-Time
DESCRIPTION
Our development team is located in the beautiful city of Rio de Janeiro - Brazil in one of the best spots in town (Ipanema). We also have an office in a co-working space located in Downtown Miami. We are looking for a senior hard-worker developer that wants to join our team in its early stage journey
REQUIREMENTS (MUST HAVE)
1 - You've built web apps with a team before ( ideally more than two )
2 - You write readable, robust and reusable code. You love code organization, standardization and know the importance of naming things right
3 - You must show us some code of your own on Github, Bitbucket (or any git based version control repository)
4 - You have a strong Ruby on Rails background, ideally with 3+ years of experience
5 - You have strong skills on front-end development and hate messy JS & CSS. You do understand the importance of building visual reusable web components using CSS & HTML.
6 - You know how to test your software using Cucumber & RSpec
7 - You are fluent in English
BONUS (GOOD TO HAVE)
1 - You know how to develop for SEO
2 - Experience with React or Vue.js (or any other JS framework)
3 - Experience with Amazon AWS & Heroku and Docker
OUR TECH STACK
Our web app is a hybrid of Ruby on Rails and JS frameworks. We use Ruby on Rails, Redis, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch and Vue.js to build our web app and administration interfaces
BENEFITS
1 - Salary - $50k - 62k (USD) (keep in mind that this is a good if you are living in Brazil)
APPLY NOW
If you reached this point and think you are a good fit for this position, send your resume to fj@lemoney.com
It's funny to see many people giving their "expert" opinion about how expensive your web site was, just by looking the design. It is very easy to say when:
1. You are not the one developing the site, thus You have no commitment.
2. You ignore all the other project requirements (already mentioned above) just by looking to the presentation layer.
If the project was too expensive, blame also the founders , which may have asked for a MVP bigger then the necessary.
Sure, but from the looks of things this is a pretty generic web site. If you have been doing development for a while that figure would be an instant red flag. Not blaming either party.
The 'additional' requirements that were listed to justify this such as administration area, caching layer, feeds, etc are really basic items.
So unless they wrote their own web server I don't see any issues with flagging this.
For all you know that figure could have been made up.
