Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | codingbear's commentslogin

Do they mention the hardware used for training? Last I heard there was a push to use Chinese silicon. No idea how ready it is for use


how are you running qwen3 with llama-vscode? I am still using qwen-2.5-7b.

There is an open issue about adding support for Qwn3 which I have been monitoring, would love to use Qwen3 if possible. Issue - https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.vscode/issues/55


I use local for code completions only. Which means models supporting FIM tokens.

My current setup is the llama-vscode plugin + llama-server running Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct. It leads to very fast completions, and don't have to worry about internet outages which take me out of the zone.

I do wish qwen-3 released a 7B model supporting FIM tokens. 7B seems to be the sweet spot for fast and usable completions


qwen3-coder-30B-A3B supports FIM and should be faster than the 7B if you got the vram.

I use bartowkski’s Q8 quant over dual 3090s and it gets up to 100tok/sec. The Q4 quant on a single 3090 is very fast and decently smart.


what is the Lua equivalent for JVM ecosystem? An embeddable language which you allows for running user scripts in a sandbox?


LuaJ, or Luna if you're brave. You can likely achieve something similar with other languages that runs on the JVM, like Kawa, Clojure or Jython.


It depends on what you mean by Software Architecture. I normally see 3 interpretations of it.

For some people, S/W arch is writing readable, maintainable code. Things like Design patterns, FP, TDD, microservices etc. There is a lot of literature on this out there.

For others, it means having the ability to design the next Kafka/Spark/React. You can get basic theory for this by reading books on Domain Modelling, Distributed computing and Algorithms. So books like The Algorithm design manual, Designing Data intensive Applications, The Parallel and Concurrent Programming in Haskell, Functional and reactive domain modelling etc. The http://aosabook.org has good case studies to read as well. However, to actually build these systems require facing the problem in the 1st place and being unable to use existing systems to solve it. Or doing phd in them. It happens rarely.

Finally, the last one is my day job. Which is to convert ramblings and fantasies of leadership into a production systems, minimizing the number of curse words people use when working on it. I haven't really found any good guides to do this though. Things which help me are:

- Always thinking what could go wrong. And if it does, who should be notified if the system can't recover. A lot of times when I don't have the answer, I ask around. Things like slack channels, mailing lists, or even having coffee with people in industry who have tackled stuff like this.

- Communication skills. This doesn't mean small talk, but being able to have conversations and meetings which help define requirements and ensure everyone is on the same page. Also making sure there are hard numbers. ie. instead of "fast","responsive" etc, get latency, throughput, uptime numbers.

- Understanding business/technical capabilities and limitations. Things like business impact(LTR etc), capabilities of current infrastructure, skill levels of various people/contractors involved etc


https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer

This is geared for interview prep but I found it a very concise overview of how to build many kinds of apps.


> minimizing the number of curse words people use when working on it

A very noble goal :)


I have the same question as well.


That's right, in the H-1B context, there needs to be an employer-employee relationship between the petitioning company and the sponsored worker and this (in the eyes of USCIS) ultimately means the ability of the petitioning company to fire the sponsored worker and otherwise control his or her employment.


So basically for a person on H1B to startup, can we take below as steps ? Please correct me if i am wrong !

1. A decide's to startup.

2. A find's 2 US citizens B & C as co-founders.

3. A gives idea to B & C and asks them to build a PRODUCT.

4. A takes 49% ownership, B & C takes 25.5 % ownership.

5. B & C finished building a MVP or SLC PRODUCT.

6. B & C apply for VC Fund.

7. B & C get X fund from Z.

8. B & C incorporate a COMPANY.

9. COMPANY sponsors H1B for A and hires A as co-founder.

10. A joins COMPANY.

11. A & B & C continue building their PRODUCT.

12. PRODUCT becomes successful.

13. A applies for STARTUP based Visa.

14. A becomes US Citizen

15. A starts COMPANY B.

Kindly tweak or update to fix any mistake in this process. I think it will be of great help to many and benefit everyone.


Oh wow !! So for giving the idea A takes 49% ownership?!


> COMPANY sponsors H1B for A and hires A as co-founder.

You cannot be hired as a cofounder you need to be hired as an employee.


"cofounder" is a legally meaningless SV term. There are three ways you can be associated with a company

1. Shareholder (anyone in the world, except few countries with sanctions)

2. On board of directors (varies from case to case)

3. Employee (requires immigration status)


Can one be hired as a CEO or CTO?

Does that count as an employee?

If one is a software developer at present in current petition can such person transfer his H1B to a role of CTO?

Are there any challenges in this?


A CEO, CTO, CFO, CXO etc. are all "employees", technically an employee is someone who works for the company (unpaid work also counts) the company.

E.g. You can have 100% equity, be sole shareholder, pay money to a manager/employee to conduct work/business. You can even derive a dividend from the said business. however you cannot "engage in business" which means that you cannot write code whose IP gets assigned to the company. You also cannot have day-to-day management responsibilities. If I remember correctly planning a business and/or attending meetings of board of directors is allowed.

At end of the day shareholding pattern trumps everything else.


100% equity would mean A would have 100% control right?

Then nobody can fire A. Hence 49%.

Can A have 100% ownership and incorporate a COMPANY and then assign BOD to COMPANY Where BOD have control over A but no ownership in company?

In this config can A just hire a employee D and pay him minimum wage according to DOL.

https://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/america.htm

Would this setup work?


The problem here is if you are A, then no one will give 49% stake to you because of your idea. This only works on paper but in reality you will get screwed.


Can anyone help me understand what kind of employment are available in the market which requires deep knowledge of compilers?

I love this subject, but I don't know to which domains it is applied on outside of compiling languages like Javascript/JAVA/D/C/Rust and so on on into Machine code.


Steve Yegge's rant opened my eyes to how useful knowledge of compilers can be: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2007/06/rich-programmer-food...


How is it organised? Is there a call for presentations a day before?

It is a Cool Idea. Thanks for suggesting it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: