Keyword: if. What little i do distribute to a few end users come from local builds through a completely separate system.
The security level applied reflects this more than well.
To my (well-founded) knowledge nobody distributes my code; and if they did they'd have full responsibility. That's what "THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS'" means. You don't have to like it and you don't have to use it.
There really is no middle ground unless you develop a relation. Who says i can be trusted? Not me!
Sue, "no basis" is perhaps a bit spicy.... but it's still an active contradiction that they could have easily changed. (And in doing so should have made them at least think twice before pushing this).
The latter. And especially the reasoning they provide W.R.T. "securing the software supply chain".
I have a strong, managed, password which is perfectly reasonable for a few hobby hacks...
