As a co-founder (Australian citizen) of a Series A funded software startup, is there an easy decision matrix on whether to apply for an E3 or O1 visa? It seems like I don't fully fit into either category.
E-3s are super quick and easy so this is definitely the first option to explore. But it requires a bachelor's degree or its equivalent in a field related to the job. And being a founder/owner can complicate the process but doesn't automatically mean an E-3 isn't an option. There's no helpful decision matrix. If you'd like, send me your resume and schedule a call and I can tell you which option to pursue.
Our goal with our dataset is to only focus on the personal web. The search APIs that LLMs use rank a lot of SEO/commercial content highly that we were not interested in
Should we take from the most vulnerable in society in order to prop up these clubs? Its not rich people dumping all their money into the pokies, its retirees and people who are broke from gambling addictions getting into debt
This was cool! I agree with a lot of the comments here re: making read open for unauthenticated users especially. Nice one getting something up and sharing it
I would imagine they have a small engineering team in Japan to help give the best feedback on localization of the model outputs.
I think the bigger picture is that Japan has promoted strong support for AI companies and OpenAI in particular, and so the company wants to positively reinforce that as a model for other countries to emulate.
I like nextjs deployed on vercel but am not a big fan with the new direction of next so open to other frameworks. The other libraries I tend to change up depending on use case or what I want to try out. (this is mostly for basic crud/LLM wrapper apps)
Not the OP but agree with their comment. For me, since Next 13 it's been a mess. The transition to the app router has been incredibly complex with lots of undocumented edge cases and other issues. Rendering in general has become very confusing with server-side, client-side and everything in between. There's also no real guidelines/structure for handling remote content, requiring projects like ContentLayer (which may actually be discontinued).
I've seen ESOP agreements where after a given period of time the options automatically convert to shares to help mitigate this risk for staff. Worth asking the leadership team as I think its a fair concern that many employees will have