Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dudewhocodes's commentslogin

App Store releases are increasing due to a new gold rush on subscription apps. Review times have gotten longer as the review team at Apple is being spammed.

Most of these apps are rudimentary habit trackers, time management apps etc. so not much creativity, much more recycled ideas. More code != better ideas though.

https://www.a16z.news/i/185469925/app-store-engage https://42matters.com/ios-apple-app-store-statistics-and-tre...


End of 2022: 1,783,232 apps

End of 2023: 1,870,119 apps

End of 2024: 1,961,596 apps

Now: 2,150,612 apps, after 1.18 years.

+160k apps a year, that's only 84% above pre-AI era (safe to say that apps were not routinely built with AI in 2023 yet). Noticeable increase but doesn't feel dramatic, especially since yes, majority of those new apps are low-effort trash like those described in this thread.


Also a lot more clone ideas these days. AI has definitely empowered people to write things from scratch, either as a product to sell or as internal projects inside companies.


Heh, I guess Apple needs to better use AI to review all the AI-written apps.


The referenced post has a very high change of being planted. The upvote count is an anomaly for a brand new account, few sentences, no link, Tell HN post.

I upvoted it by mistake, it looked genuine at first. However the comments contain a lot of "everything is awesome" responses without backing up their claims. The poster does not participate in the discussion at all.

I like HN but it seems to be getting spammed with hidden ads.


  > I upvoted it by mistake
You can unvote stuff. Not sure for how long though.


Two hours, I believe.


There's a lot of tech banter on Twitter and LinkedIn, much of which is noise you can filter out.

SaaS is not dead. People and businesses benefit from having relatively cheap access to maintained standardized software.

The "SaaS is dead" idea comes from some people using coding agents and thinking that companies will now produce their own internal software packages (CRM etc.) instead of buying in. Why would they bother?

However, highly-specific internal software might see interesting developments.


Have people naturally started sounding like an LLM when they write and talk? To me this article reads not fully human.


There's multiple things happening here. People are using LLMs to write, for sure. It's only natural to absorb what you consume, so as people read more LLM generated content they can unintentionally emit it.

And then there's classic confirmation bias; a lot of people wrote in dry academic prose.


I'm expecting a similar situation to the Video game crash of 1983 which happened due to total market saturation with low quality products.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_crash_of_1983

Everyone is talking about how many things they are building. Non-devs suddenly building... But nobody seems to call out the basic law of supply and demand.

You can be the greatest marketer but you will fail when all channels are flooded. Thinking your "taste" will save you is a false fallacy, most mainstream products suck and people still buy them. There's not an infinite demand for software.

It will eventually settle in some new market configuration. However devs shouldn't have broken their market by letting everyone in, was a stupid professional move.


Yes but back then, everybody just got bored of their Ataris and moved on.

Nobody is throwing out their phone or computer. Software will still be needed.

That said, there will be a lot of noise, with 100 choices in each category, how does one rise to the top? Is it simply the one that sticks around the longest and doesn't become abandonware?


The agents are good enough to get results when an experienced person is properly guiding these tools.

However, during the holidays there was a big marketing campaign, mainly on Twitter. Everyone started posting the same talking points repeatedly and suddenly, and triggered a storm of fomo perfect for when everyone was not working.

There was no sudden huge jump, I've been using AI code tools since 2024 and was surprised to see this sudden hype when the tools worked ok before.


This is also my feeling. When people keep referring to big jumps or inflection points, I am left confused, because the models have felt good for a long time and feel like they are getting steadily better. This could be biased by what I use them for though.


I see it the same way. Why would we rebuild a custom solution when $10 per user has it all?

SaaS was always about the service part and works better when other companies use the same tool.

Unique software specific to business needs will get more interesting though.


Usually its cause the market movers force anyone not moving towards the billionaire VC businness has to raise their cost.

This is usually masked by vertical integrate and buyout of competition.

So either your servicd raises prces to avoid buyout or it gets bought.


This is the lifecycle of SaaS tho. It opens up opportunities for competitors to launch and build something more nieche, which is good for customers. And then it repeats


Yeah, it repeats until fascism shows up and decides the billionaire class and nepo babies is all "we" need.


"Building X is easy now"... it was never hard if you had the patience to read docs.

We should be saying "Building X is faster now" instead. But I guess that doesn't induce god complex that effectively.


I've noticed a change in technical blog articles in the past 2 years. Why do most contain phrases like "everything changes", "not behind (yet)" etc.?

If you have a valid point to make, you don't need to force FOMO on the reader.


There are websites with the spells listed... which makes this a search problem. Why is an LLM used here?


It's just a benchmark test excersize.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: