Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ewan's commentslogin

a related publication that provides some further context, and a link to the article if you have a subscription / wish to pay: http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110824/full/news.2011.504.ht...

"At the moment, it actually says nothing about a possible cosmic-ray effect on clouds and climate, but it's a very important first step" - Jasper Kirkby


http://heartbeat.skype.com/2011/05/an_update_on_todays_downt...

stopped me getting errors connecting, but it would be unusual if all my contacts are really offline

https://twitter.com/#!/skype now acknoledges an issue


In what seems like an eternity ago I had a similar decision to make - choosing between a very large (100k+ employees; non-IT focus) organisation and what today would probably have been called a startup (~10 people across 2 continents; IT product development & sales)

I chose (your) option 1, partly because I figured they were a good company to have on my cv whatever the outcome, and partly because they offered a few k more a year. Frankly I think you should try to ignore the money aspect, but when a few k is a sizeable percentage of your total salary, I know this is difficult to do.

10+ years later I've lived in 3 countries, flown business a lot more often then I would probably have paid for myself, and enjoyed the sort of perks you seem to like the look of in option 1. I've done some interesting technology based work along the way, but I've also done a lot of administrativa.

In my case, it was important that the organisation kept trading for the duration of my year's internship, or I wouldn't have recieved the course credit. If this is applicable to you, it is something to consider in your choice. Remember both organisations (their Australian office at least) could have risks in this regard.

Good luck!


Everywhere I've lived public service announcements say that "E" is the gateway to dangerous stuff


This seems a perfect title for an article about educating people!


And for subtitles, have a look at http://universalsubtitles.org - anyone wanting English subs created should drop me a line. I've done a small number of these now, eg http://universalsubtitles.org/en/videos/xPy3pbVWResd/info/Ze...



http://www.cyber-ark.com/digital-vault-products/enterprise-p... is something I've worked with, though I've never seen what I would consider a well integrated deployment


I think the challenge with Facebook, is that a large number of people using it don't understand what they are sharing. What they share about themselves is really none of my business. What I do need to be mindful of is:

A lot of people, including those who get paid to work in IT roles and are supposedly of a technical mindset, don't understand what information they are sharing about themselves and their friends when they interact with FB applications

This is different from real life, where most people will evaluate what they share about you with 3rd parties. In the case of FB applications, many people don't understand what is happening, and thus the evaluation phase is completely bypassed. Even if you would put your life in somebodies hands in the real world, you have to apply a different set of criteria to that same person / decision in the virtual world.


So the intention is to prevent counterfeiting by attaching something to the product that is easily counterfeitable. If this makes sense to you, and your business is not selling RFID components / products, please do enlighten me.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: