Agreed. Do we have any information on what these "vulnerabilities" actually are? Every vulnerability is typically immediately reported to CVE or NIST... are these "so destructive" they have to be kept behind closed doors? Give me a break...
I don't see the problem - everything the author describes has, and will always be, true. You can't vibe code anything of value in a weekend exactly because anyone _else_ with the same level of experience can do the exact same thing in the same weekend! This has always been true across all trades and technologies. Once again, the domain expertise, wisdom, and simply _time_ of doing something always win. LLMs literally don't change that at all.
this is extremely strawman - with this your basically saying any software ever that has parts written by automation or cron jobs (even before llms) is not a product worth using? foolish.
Your response reads much more like a strawman than my original comment.
I’d challenge you to identify where in my post I said I wouldn’t use software that employs automation?
It is pretty clear I am not talking about running CI for automated and predictable signals or cron jobs. I am talking about using AI to write code and also fix tests.
It is exceedingly clear in practice that the volume of code produced by LLMs is too much for the humans using these tools to read and understand. We are collectively throwing decades of best practices out of the window in service of “velocity.” Even the FAANG shops I know of who previously had good engineering cultures seem to be endorsing the cult of: AI generated everything with stamp approval.
Lots of hate for NextJS in here so im wondering what people use as an alternative framework...
Gatsby? I used to use that one until the updates basically ceased to exist.
Vite with <insert your favorite here> - looks good, but at initial glance seems to favor just pure speed for any other feature support like MDX, advanced SEO, etc.
Roll your own with React and webpack? Good luck, and you'll probably end up with something that looks like the others I've mentioned above.
Just surprised many comments are just stating complaints about Next and not providing any counter examples, its very un-HN.
This stood out to me as well. The level of discourse is incredibly low compared to other topics. Huge amount of "next/vercel sucks" without any constructive or deeper argument made.
There is a similar vibe on the Next.js subreddit, just enormous amounts of shallow negativity. Very strange.
(I'm not saying there aren't valid reasons to dislike the framework or company but the way it's expressed is consistently incredibly juvenile for some reason)
Eh, it's been rehashed over and over again. People experienced with Next.js and other frameworks don't need to read the same constructive, deeper arguments being made ad infinitum. It's like when people say microslop or micro$oft, everyone knows what they're talking about.
Astro, Nuxt, SvelteKit, SolidStart, React Router (prev. Remix), among others
Vite has plugins for MDX, SSR, etc. You can easily build your own framework if you want in a few hundred lines of glue code.
The criticisms of Next / React are so ubiquitous you can metaphorically gesture in their direction and most people know what's up. It's like wondering why someone said "ai slop" and didn't provide an expose on the quality of AI writing.
so... MCP? can anyone explain what a "claw" is apposed to a "skill" or similar? if not, let's assume in three weeks a new term called "waffle" appears - can you explain what that is?
They said at the time that Go let them keep the overall structure of the code, that is, they weren't trying to do a re-implementation from scratch, more of a port, and so the port was more straightforward with Go.
regardless its been 3 years since the release of chatgpt. literally 3. imagine in just 5 more years how much low hanging (or even big breakthroughs) will get into the pricing, things like quantization, etc. no doubt in my mind the question of "price per token" will head towards 0
They literally removed "don't be evil" from their internal code of conduct. That wasn't even a real binding constraint, it was simply a social signalling mechanism. They aren't even willing to uphold the symbolic social fiction of not being evil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_be_evil
Google, like Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, etc were, and still are, proud partners of the US intelligence community. That same US IC that lies to congress, kills people based on metadata, murders civilians, suppresses democracy, and is currently carrying out violent mass round-ups and deportations of harmless people, including women and children.
What about the client ? I find the Claude cliënt better in planning, making the right decision steps etc. it seems that a lot of work is also in the cli tool itself. Specially in feedback loop processing (reading logs. Browsers. Consoles etc)
reply