Why would you link to one of the most extreme mentally unwell twitter accounts immediately after a sentence on criticizing people willingness to consume propaganda?
Your unfounded ad hominem attacks aside, everything posted both there and on The Intercept are provably true. Interesting that you conveniently ignore the main issue here, which is the lack of integrity.
You should probably give credit to Casey / Handmade Hero with regards to your windows platform code. Well its kinda scattered around, so probably just credit in general.
Here 'from scratch' probably means 'from fundamentals', e.g. without a prefab game engine, as opposed to 'taking no inspiration or lessons from anyone else or using any library code written by other people'.
> “If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe” :)
This is something I posted on Casey's first handmade video, together with some counter arguments to his rant on the shortcomings of c++ and windows. He has since disabled comments.
I think its because it's sort of gone in the opposite way that science usually goes. Science traditionally been the process of physical phenomena that we don't understand => falsifiable theory that helps describe that phenomena.
Meanwhile, we started at stuff like the perceptron. The starting point was that we knew everything about that equation/classifier. Now we have a thing that we built from the ground up, and we don't fully grasp how it all comes together.
From the blog that another reply linked (https://acko.net/blog/zero-to-sixty-in-one-second/)
'Rather than try and emulate some of the bling for CSS 3D-only environments, it's all or nothing. Without WebGL, you get plain images.'
Although this blog post is from 2013, so who knows if this is the actual reason.
Thankfully, the blog post also links to a video so you can still view it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjwA1VmuPnw
The iPad does present itself as Mac useragent now, so I think it is deliberately targeting iOS devices and the iPad doesn't match that anymore. Even when I sized the split screen down to a narrow column it still gives me the full version.
I guess very roughly you can say that if you describe a system with some set of parameters, which when changed in particular ways leave the system's quantities (energy, momentum, etc..) unchanged then you have a connection between symmetry and conserved quantities.
But note that this can be misleading (as could be any hand-wavy “explanation”). For example, a time shift does not affect the system’s angular momentum, but that does not mean that the conservation of the latter follows from the symmetry alluded to by the former.
Have you tried WSL? The NVidia developer CUDA repo has a specific folder for "wsl-ubuntu" where you only install the toolkit and it reuses the Windows graphics drivers IIRC.
Yes. I did do for a while but it used to involve very specific CUDA versions and other dependencies which I found restricted what I could do outside of WSL. I was waiting for it to settle down.
I believe it has in Windows 11 but I'm holding off on that because it's still unstable for some VR usage.
Because her income depends on maintaining her instagram account. That's a material need, anything in the other direction is a rationalization. You might as well say a prisoner forced her prison guard to sleep with her by being so appealing.
A prisoner sleeping with a guard is an obvious abuse of power… if they remain imprisoned. I’d not know what to make of it though if the prisoner was freed though.
It’s like bribing a cop to destroy evidence of wrong doing, rather than being forced to bribe them since they stopped you on the road. If the bribe removes you from their power then it changes the dynamic and moral outcome.
> She was banned repeatedly, which does make it feel a little extortion-esque, akin to the cop throwing you back in prison so you can bribe him again.
She was probably also violating policies repeatedly (e.g. sexual nudity).
I think viewing this situation as a case of a purely unidirectional power dynamic is an ideologically-motivated falsehood. She's got one kind of power, the Facebook employees have another kind, and it's unclear who (if anyone) is on the loosing end.
I mean, she claims she was literally hunting for Facebook employees to achieve her goals (likely to not suffer the usual consequence for policy violations). It's also quite possible that the employees she successfully used could get fired on account of the situation she consciously engineered. This also has one of the hierarchy or duty-of-care dynamics that you'd have in a school or workplace setting.
> I mean, she claims she was literally hunting for Facebook employees to achieve her goals
Yeah, and if you check her IG page, as of today it explicitly states that she is looking for TikTok employees now, probably for the exact same purpose (but that one is just a speculation on my part).
As a sidenote, on her twitter she referred to the whole incident as "When Instagram tried to cuck me so I took my power back"[0].
EDIT: looks like her IG went private at some point earlier today, so I cannot see that statement about TikTok there anymore (and no, I am not going to request to follow her account just to find that one post).
Literally everyone income is dependent on various types of enforcement authorities (HR, professional licensing boards, cops, osha, etc) not being on their case.
I have a very hard time seeing anyone who manages to pull a fast one on some stupid bureaucracy as a victim.
The only difference between this scenario and an actual porno setup is that the meta employee isn't a college professor who controls her grade.
You could make the argument that it's only a power dynamic problem if the IG employee is the first to bring up sex, but if a college student offers to sleep with their professor to get a better grade, if the professor accepts are they benefiting from a power dynamic? I would say, very clearly yes.
The hypothetical professor, or meta employee, is transacting business that creates a conflict of interest with their prior business relationship with their employer.
This is little different from me tipping the safelite guy to lay a bead of sealant on some other stuff while he's at it.
He´s trying to identify the strongest power dynamic. The natural balance is towards Meta, since she needs more to have her account unbanned, but if it was also her plan, and it worked, it balances out.
According to the tweet: "She said she got her Instagram deleted so she just started messaging Facebook employees on LinkedIn and having sex with them until one finally gave her her account back".
Its a research paper, the audience is going to be other experts in the field; it will be written in a way suitable for publishing to a journal. Even with a concise writing style, the paper is already at 100 pages. If you want to understand the paper it would make more sense to pick up a textbook and learn about the prerequisite material rather then expecting them to write a book for you, just to communicate their research result.
I would agree with this, good explanations and rigour are definitely not mutually exclusive. But I am not sure what you are expecting. This is a research paper, intended to be read by other experts. Even still, if we look at how the paper is organised, the authors start with a high level overview, and build upon simpler problems to leverage their way to an understanding of the main result. For a research paper, it is extremely thorough.
If you want a 'simple explanation' that allows a layman to gain some understand the problem, sure. But this isn't, and absolutely should not be, the purpose or content of the research publication, which is to succinctly communicate to other experts the results of their findings.
It's hard enough to create the thing and make your explanation fit on the page limit. You also want people to make it comprehensible at the same time?
If you want to, you can study it, make it easier to understand and write another paper. If it's good, you will do both yourself and the original author a huge favor.
