Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hackly's commentslogin

Trust doesn’t matter if you have the most powerful military force in the world. You think the middle eastern countries surrounding Israel trust Netanyahu? Nope, but they sure fall in line and keep the negotiated peace because let’s face it, all of them combined will crumble before a single Israeli battalion. Might does indeed work in negotiations regardless of trust.


Talk about hubris. The US military is specified to fight a 2 front war, but has proved singularly unable to defeat other countries in occupation. The idea the US can just blackmail the world by force may be about to be tested, but I wouldn't be willing to bet on its success.


I don’t think that’s a fair assumption.


I’m tired of winning boss.


- Xi Jinping, 2027


Only one man knows the answer to this question.


He doesn't know either.


War/Weapons industry has been very active lately.


Every other movie coming out of Hollywood features the army, guns or military equipment in some fashion. Cinema is a PR channel for this industry.


> If you create more competition, everybody should benefit.

Except shareholders


Sorry, shareholders. gg no re


Boo hoo. Own it.


Some people only get sunlight from stepping out of their tiny homes or basement offices to go work at the office.


Don’t think it has to do with class. Surgeons and dentists still need to show up to work. Even in tech, the higher up you are, the more likely you will want to be in the office.


The upper class at least gets the choice. The lower class does not.


If you don't show up to work, you will be fired. If you are fired for not showing up to work, finding your next income source will be more difficult. This is true regardless of whether you're making $7.50/hr or $350k/yr.

Yes, the doctor making $350k/yr can arrange his life in such a way to be more flexible in the face of diversity, but he's just as likely to have $150k worth of school debt and a house/car/etc. he couldn't afford if he had to switch careers. At $7.50/hr, you can probably walk down the street and find a better paying job.

Edit in reply due to depth restrictions: I'm not suggesting this is about ease of switching careers. I'm suggesting that you will be forced to switch careers if you don't show up to work, and it's probably easier to switch between jobs with no prerequisites than careers with 8 years of intensive prerequisites and $150k in university.


I didn't mean "choice to easily switch to whatever job they want at their convenience" and the notion that I did mean that is so absurd that I find it to be a bad faith read of my comment. I encourage you to first steel-man my position. Or don't, that's fine too. Just don't respond with such a technical and self-assured response that is in fact arguing against a point you yourself imagined (and is not rooted in reality). It is exhausting to debate against, especially on the internet.


Isn’t that a form of affirmative action that the Supreme Court took issue with?


It most definitely is not.


Yes, but just as they’d prefer playing video games over reading books. Might have been absent from their life at times, but I’m sure they’ll appreciate the properties and stocks I’ll leave behind for them.


As someone with a friend who grew up under a dad like you… no they won’t. They’ll talk a whole lot of shit to someone like me about what an emotionally unavailable parent you were. Sure, they’ll acknowledge the privileged circumstances they grew up in and be grateful that they at least have that going for them, but not a single shred of that gratitude will extend to you or the decisions you made.

Then again, everyone’s different, and maybe your kids will react differently. Just don’t be surprised if you get a shitty relationship with your kids later on.


This is a bit of a meme recently: “I am not a workaholic, I’m creating generational wealth!”

I can’t say for sure from here, but beware of this idea floating around in the zeitgeist.


And your kid will blow that generational wealth because that’s life and wealth rarely lasts more than 3 generations


Generational wealth isn't capital though some fools mistake it for such.


What makes you so sure? Did you discuss this with your kids, if they’re old enough, or with your friends’ older kids?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: