A previous post here on HN [1] discussed the leak of the original LLaMA model and Stable Diffusion. The article points out that the open-source community's effort resulted in more innovation, and an ecosystem built up around these models leading to rapid adoption. That gives more control to the original authors of the model against their competitors. I think Meta has recognized this and wants to keep their lead going.
They’re also already giving out millions of dollars in man hours in releasing and maintaining open source software, as well as lots of other much less used ML models. So they have an existing open source strategy and it makes sense to double down on this one since it’s clearly more impactful than a lot of the other ones
Hi, Azure admin here. The Azure Policy service includes a set of built-in policies to handle tags. There's one policy that requires new resource groups to be created with specific tags. Another policy allows resources within the resource group to inherit the same tags. I think this combination of policies would solve the tagging problem quite neatly, though I haven't tested it myself.
Hi, I think the key issue with both the Azure policy, and the Amazon services is that they only work after a pull request has been merged. Then the build fails, and the engineer has to come back to their code, make a new Pull Request and then send it again, till it passes.
That's the feedback we got from users, so with Infracost, the Pull Request itself tells the engineer what needs to be done, along with exact code line numbers etc before going any further, so everything is fixed within the same pull request. Also, it works across all cloud providers, so FinOps can set central tags in a uniform manner no matter where the engineers are launching resources.
Not a perfect solution to this scenario, but I have used multiple Firefox profiles in the past this way. The profiles are isolated at the file-system level, so extensions remain separate. So you could have a 'hardened' profile will all the blocking/cleaning extensions, and a 'trusted' profile with no extensions. Profile isolation also covers configuration, so you could even tweak those independently.
I've experimented with that from time to time, but it hasn't stuck. The problem is when I click through. Container tabs handles that, but I would have to be extremely vigilant to prevent sites from loading outside of the hardened profile.
Thanks. I found it annoying that the author never says what kanban is. By leading the title with scrum, you can argue that it’s for those familiar with it. But then the article neglects to describe the alternative it claims is better.
It’s akin to saying, “You don’t need yoga; just do twiddlebop right,” and never saying what twiddlebop is.
It’s also rife with meaningless declarations, like the one about “pushing decisions to the edge of the team.” WTF is that supposed to mean?
As I understand it, this makes use of the 'Smart keywords' feature that's native to Firefox[1]. Take a search URL, add a keyword to it, and you can then use it as 'keyword search_term'. I use this for a few of the sites that I frequent.
What's a pity is some browsers don't promote their native features, which leads most to be unaware of them and then browser makers likely see metrics showing little use of them.
Opera (pre-Chromium) had this feature to begin with, then Firefox (using bookmarks to store the keywords instead). Vivaldi browser retains the Opera style custom search UI and whenever I find myself searching a site enough I just create a nickname for it (eg: to archive the URL directly to archive.org/is, search caniuse.com, among dozens of others).
> What's a pity is some browsers don't promote their native features, which leads most to be unaware of them
Too true. I've wondered for a while what the keyword field in a bookmark was for.
I also found out just the other day that I can add search engines to Firefox[1] if the site supports the OpenSearch API[2]. I didn't know they could be added this way, nor did I know about OpenSearch, if I hadn't have searched for an easier way to search a site I frequent then I would never have known.
Chrome also has this feature: I recently realised this as a Firefox user after being semi-forced to half-switch to Chrome for a good portion of my work.
It's incredibly well hidden though, and the UX is horrific, which I'm convinced must be deliberate.
Yeah, I use this feature constantly. I have e.g. wp to search wikipedia, im to search imdb, di to search dictionary.com.
For anyone else on Firefox, there's no need to go through a search engine or install anything. Just follow the instructions in that link. It'll change your life.
I use a service named Penzu for keeping a journal. It's primarily web-based, but you can make it email-based if you wish to. Basically, you'd set up a daily reminder at a specific time, and you can reply directly to that email to make a new entry.
I should point out that Penzu is not a completely free service. There is a basic free tier, and then there are paid plans with additional features.
