One should stay anonymous on THE INTERNET if they feel offended. When you put our bladder in front of wolves , you should not argue about wolves are wrong.
If you out your personal stuff on internet, be it just your name you invited people to disect it!
yes its all that, but people invest in crypto as they don't want to be regulated any more.
government control people using money, all these people are more worried about loosing this control , rather than securing financial security of people.
I personally thought this during my college days. Never pursued this idea but kept it my mind as a way to compress files and share just index to first meta data, which will then link to next and next and so on.
Status equals to power, the more powerfull you are , say by your mind, or money or beauty or by simply usefulness, the more status you have in society.
Why weren't the CEO and the presenters were wearing it, if its so easy and natural to switch between immersive and real world?
I am not impressed so far. Yeah you have better display, but its not something a trend setter AR/VR headset would have looked like.
patent are necessary, but they must be only granted for 5 years of time span. 5 years of leverage to patent holder is more than enough for them to cover up there research cost
I don't think you should be downvoted for suggesting this. I have wondered if it makes sense to adjust the amount of 'research hours' to how long it would take a competitor to produce the same result, and protect a patent for that length of time. To me 5 year seems arbitrary, and the rate at which people are innovating seems to get faster and faster. 5 years used to sound reasonable, but may be exceedingly unfair at today's technological pace.
So then you look at things like, 'well has this patent protected the innovation to get it to market during its lifetime?' Maybe it should be re-evaluated every year to determine if the patent is serving its purpose, or simply protecting no marketable product.
Maybe we should look at the value of the product being created and once that product has earned x-wealth the patent is ended?
I will admit I'm in the camp of "patents are bad -> period", but I was surprised to see your submission at the bottom here. I don't think you're far off.
non-patent holder can use those 5 year to improve the product in parallel (in shadow, without commercialization), so once those 5 year completes they can compete with the patent holders evolved product after 5 year.
it do not stops innovation, neither prolong human progression for too long.
Its not noticible at the client side as much it is at the server side. Every millisecond saved at server side allows it to serve other thousands of connections.
