Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nighthawk's commentslogin

I'm a huge fan of http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/ for finding USGS maps - it's a simple, visual browser to find all available years + scale levels for any location.


Thanks, I think I phrased the question poorly as I wasn't suggesting a weakness in bitcoin, I was wondering whether there might be any value to the mining output.


The primary value of the mining output is heat.


the monumental fuck up was cancelling mysql backup and having all engineers work directly with the production database, what you did was INEVITABLE..


>"He was clearly someone who knew he had really fucked up this time and couldn't use his age as an excuse."

That's a bold statement - I don't know his full history or all the facts of his case, but what you're implying is that someone's past actions and convictions are all that's needed to asses their present guilt.

Did it ever occur to you that maybe he was innocent and maybe he knew everyone would think like you? It doesn't take much to realize that this way of thinking quickly leads to a conviction regardless of the facts.


At trial evidence of his past conviction would have been suppressed for precisely the reason you state. However, the rules of evidence for internet posting are not quite so strict.



definitely agree, gonna be tough to argue that the corporation itself was "present" in his car


For the sake of argument, I'd say that if the car was registered in the corporation's name then yes, the corporation was present in the car.

Reasoning: if the car had been involved in an accident, who would be sued? Just the driver alone, or the driver and the car's owner?


Both more than likely. First the injury lawyer would get as much as they can from the company's insurance, THEN if that was successful. They could go down the path to get money from the driver, seeing how it was their fault to begin with. It's all really up to how greedy / badly injured the victim is.


this is definitely one thing that california's got right.

"Non-compete agreements are automatically void as a matter of law in California, except for a small set of specific situations expressly authorized by statute. They were outlawed by the original California Civil Code in 1872."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause


IANAL but I think the clause totally flies in the face of free-agency. Existing IP protections already should cover a former employers concerns; if I rip off a trade secret for a competitor from a former employer, then I am already breaking an existing law and can be taken to court regardless of a no-compete clause. The no compete clause is an onerous restriction placed on all parties; innocence regardless.

When I walk out the door, I would assume the contract is over and I'm at liberty to use my freedom of contract to go elsewhere.


Ah, I think people are downvoting you because they thought you meant CA's clause flies in the face of free-agency. You actually meant no-compete clauses do, right? If so, yes, that's the point of them.


interesting, although there's plenty that seems obvious but upon deeper inspection one realizes he doesn't understand it at all. maybe that's true understanding?

quick example - you hold a ball and let it go. "obviously" it drops, but think about it - why did it drop and I'm pretty sure even the most advanced string theorists couldn't explain definitively why it went towards the ground.

"true knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing" - socrates


Yep, watch Feynman in "Fun to Imagine 4: Magnets (and 'Why?' questions...)" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM).


great clip!


Here's one that relates to your Socrates reference -- "true knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing".

It's a Charlie Rose segment where Jim Collins is discussing his book "How the Mighty Fall" (http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10565). He talks about the five stages of decline in any great enterprise. Stage 1 is hubris -- thinking you know it all.


Great little epistemological thread.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: