Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | noelsusman's commentslogin

You can really just say anything and get upvoted on this website.

If this were true then private insurers would have paid comparable rates to Medicare prior to the ACA passing, and that's just not the case. This fact has been a fixture of the US healthcare system since the creation of Medicare.


Shutting down production doesn't pressure the US at all since the oil and gas can't go anywhere anyway. They're shutting it down because they have to, there's nowhere to put the oil.

It would be relatively trivial to build a system that gives an LLM the tools necessary to go through each citation in a legal brief and verify its authenticity, and that's something I think opus-4.6 or gpt-5.3 could complete reliably.

Why does Trump want to give a woke radical leftist AI the ability to autonomously kill people? Doesn't seem like the smartest decision.


This is one of the most "AI tech bro bubble" comments I've ever seen. The broader job market is a bloodbath right now.


Why is this statement in all lowercase? Is this a tech bro thing I'm unaware of?


Because he's a humble guy just like you and me. Big letters mean big man and he's just a little everyman guy, relatable and cool.


Just a Jack Dorsey thing. He writes all of his communications like that.


The notion that it's bad to signal virtue is one of the crazier propaganda efforts I've seen over the last 20 years or so.


It’s a manipulative tactic. Businesses have no soul and no conscience.


It's arguable that businesses are subject to the same morality-inducing processes that humans are. For example, as a human (with a soul?) what is at risk when we do something immoral? I see it to be a reputational cost at the highest level. Morality could be viewed from the perspective that it increases predictability/coherence in society (generates less heat).


If societal feedback is the only thing keeping a human from deviating in catastrophic ways, that’s what we call a sociopath.


The humans working there do. To state otherwise is to absolve those humans of any responsibility.


Did I state otherwise though?


Did I say you stated otherwise?


The people who did best during the gold rush were the people who went out and were lucky enough to find stockpiles of gold.


From the model's perspective it's completely different. LLMs have no concept of what a letter is due to the way they're trained.


I'm not sure what your point is. How is "being exposed to X's current user base instead of their old followers" not equivalent to "turning on the feed algorithm"? You doubt the effect is due to the algorithm, but your alternative explanation describes exactly what the algorithm does.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: