Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | peeja's commentslogin

Maybe it would help to show them disabled and give an explanation like this when you try to use it?


For Superbad I hit Deadpool, Hangover, and 21 Jump Street. Ah, well.


Wouldn't it be easier to just fix the CSS?


No, since the text used code semantics. A better solution would be to introduce a few more formatting options, such as attributed and unattributed quote blocks.


I've already fixed the CSS for hacker news several times; they always reject my suggestions though. It's like they want to keep it shitty


Or get a browser that works?


The web would be a lot more accessible if so many designers didn't think like you.


Author here. I actually glossed over some of the problems here, as the article was already getting quite long. In a trivial example like this, you're right. If you do this to the entire page, though, it gets stickier. An additional problem is that you're throwing away and rebuilding state that's associated with the elements, such as event handlers. (Also, letting React do the actual DOM manipulation makes it easier to implement transitions, where a Virtual DOM element goes away now, but the real DOM element sticks around for a bit while it animates off.)

To be fair, I haven't done actual benchmarks, and I'm basing this on the stated rationale for React. I'd be surprised if swapping out the DOM of most of the page wasn't considerably slower more difficult to work with than what React does, though.


That's really interesting. Have you or someone else written up that workflow?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: