What's cool is that they aren't adjusting the temperature of the model live, or predicting/labeling any of the fork/lock points.

Get into the account, change the phone number, and start charging the cards on file. Or look through iCloud data for passwords/contacts

"Requiring an account" means leaning in the Apple/Disney direction - upselling, walled gardens and milking captive customers. Dropping the account requirement is a symbolic (and practical!) step in the other direction, towards using the product as a tool.

That's fair, so is the outrage focused on Microsoft because they are a "more" open system without the app store being the default method of installing apps?

I guess I'm wondering why Apple and Google don't get the same pushback?

Lockdown mode could be life or death for some users. Adding toggles and partial states increases complexity and risk.

Perhaps it's time to acknowledge you probably don't know what another persons situation is. Instead of trying to tell them what to do, allow them to choose.

No, lockdown mode isn't a feature for you to do random things. It's a feature to keep gays in Saudi Arabia alive. Non-Han Chinese alive in China. Journalists in Mexico alive.

If they have the option to turn off the life saving measure they will. Thats the way it goes. Bc we don't know which one is the life saving measures, and they depend on each other anyway

You guys are incredibly selfish and self centered to be acting this way

I’m glad you know more any a person’s life than they do. Incredible

The average Non-Han Chinese person doesn't know lockdown mode exists.

If you want to frame it as a life-saving feature, it should be on by default and impossible to turn off, or at the very least should be a required prompt during initial phone setup.

I'm asking for something that will make more people more secure, since I personally know plenty of people who want iMessage security, but for the web to still be functional (i.e. JIT to work).

> If they have the option to turn off the life saving measure they will

Then they'll just turn off all of lockdown mode, like they do now, to see a good friend's photo album. Great.

... I feel like we're talking past each other, and frankly with your tone of voice you're clearly not going to listen to anything anyone says on this, so there's not really any point in having this discussion at all.

The more they share, the easier it is to exploit the system.

Great question! Clean separation between Gemini Pro and the other answers

Yea Gemini is the only model that chose based on the correct reason, the other ones got kind of lucky

Baseline demand affects the numbers much more than the unpredictable spikes do. You can come up with edge cases if you like, but the reality is that it all averages out pretty well with large volume.

And how are you supposed to guarantee equivalent functionality by analyzing "README files, API docs, and type definitions"?

It's described on the web page but it's by having 2 agents. One has access to the code and one doesn't.

Are they the same model?

Not that it matters, I just think the joke is more fun if they are different.

It depends. Although they always have entirely separate contexts.

The joke is that you don’t.

It's very rational to overshoot in that situation. If you build your lifestyle and then FIRE, you are derisking your budget while you still have income.

But wanting to change your lifestyle when you retire is incredibly risky, especially if you're young without life experience.

Any misstep costs you a fraction of lifetime earnings, and there's no way to recover it.

Taste is definitely not overindexing on "it's not x, it's y" and accusing everyone who makes a comparison of being a bot