Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | startswithaj's commentslogin

So how does this differ from Ox?


We have a FAQ[1] which is being fleshed out but take a look if it helps.

We are 100% non-rent seeking.

In Ethdex we incentivise Trading platforms by allowing fees to be charged in Eth, the natural currency of Ethereum. Not by creating a token and forcing its utility (ala ZRX and 0x).

We also support Multi-Relay, which is something 0x does not support. As a maker you can submit your order to every trading platform, every slack channel and every subreddit. Other platforms cannot do this.

We also don't have any obligations to VC's to ensure they make profit.

[1]: http://ethdex.io/faq


Mark Smith's reading of Great Expectations is great highly recommend.


I guess, the trivial inconvenience of the user having to return, recreate the lineup from scratch and remember the 10 digit number/salt (or pull from local memory/localStorage if its the same device) . They would have to do this after the start of the first game but before the end of all the events in the event group. I.E before winners are calculated. If you didn't force the players to do this early on, you wouldn't be able to see live rankings which would take some fun out of it I guess. There would be other problems I guess to with edit lineup functionality.

It is a good idea though and would certainly curb this kind of thing happening.


Of course the hash posting and remembering the digits would be done by a DFS client you are using. There could also be intermediares to which you "deposit" your line-ups and they post them for you once the deadline arrives - all is needed is a line-up matching the hash, no authorization from the player required.

Editing the functionality is easy as well, you just replace the hash again. It just requires a local client to do so instead of doing it on the server directly.


There's a web and command-line version too.

https://eatkeep.io

https://github.com/startswithaj/eating-cli


Quickcal


Does anybody know where I can find other music similar to that of the video?



Aphex Twin: Avril 14th https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeLuQ6X2ixI

Boards of Canada: Dayvan Cowboy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2zKARkpDW4

Solar Fields: Reborn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD2bLKIDaT0

Brian Eno: Music for Airports https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KGMo9yOaSU

And so forth, I have something of an incomplete playlist of similar 'ambient' http://audiosplitter.fm/playlists/ambient/2289864


similar style musicians are often in the cycle on http://soma.fm


hey thanks for this! awesome.


Reminds me a lot of this BT's album This Binary Universe that came out in the mid 2000's. Here's a youtube playlist of it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7bdECd3pQ0&list=PLDA866CB62...


BT ftw.


There is a Music credit at the end of the video for Rhian Sheehan: Imber. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjR4IInfOa4


This is suprising but now compare this to rainforest devastation in the Amazon and the rest of the world and I doubt we're in the positive overall which is what logically counts.


I came across an equally strange bug a year or so ago.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22139746/ios-javascript-e...

I found a way to reproduce it, put in a bug report with apple and never got a response.



Doing 256 bit sign ecdsa's for 10s: 42874 256 bit ECDSA signs in 9.99s

Doing 2048 bit private rsa's for 10s: 1864 2048 bit private RSA's in 9.99s

That's 23 times as many signatures using ECDSA as RSA.

42 874 256

18 642 048

23 times as many signatures?


I think it's 42874/1864=23. (256 and 2048 is presumably the key strength).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: