I use a third party tool with shortcut keys that cycle between: full height, left half of screen; full height, right half of screen; full height, full width.
It works well for me, makes it easy to get two things side by side without wasting space.
That's a really nice article. I don't typically read security exploit posts but it was pretty interesting.
In the section about possible attacks, it wasn't clear if those three options represented the worst things you could do or just possible ideas. It seemed to me that locking the throttle to maximum would be worse.
Banks can (and in fact are highly incentivized) to close your account if you're using it for criminal activity with or without you lying about it on some silly form.
I think the idea is if you're attempting to actually use crypto in the way that you would normally use money (ie, to buy/sell stuff) then you don't want the volatility. So in theory, it takes away the volatility while living within the crypto ecosystem.
But obviously...things happen. Just like cash is usually relatively non-volatile, but financial crashes happen.
Many EU countries have limits on cash payments, and the EU will enforce a union-wide limit of 10,000€ in 2027. Of course, this limit won't be reevaluated over time, so the real value will decrease with inflation.
The use case would be for transactions between individuals. A friend working at a large industrial firm told me recently that crypto would solve a problem that they have in Asia: orders are often done during auctions from the producer, and require instant payments; however the payment rails take two weeks to clear a transaction. Crypto would fix this.
The fact that it's not widespread doesn't mean that there isn't a usecase.
It says the spacecraft was tumbling, but implies that due to regaining solar power it has achieved a stable position. I'm curious about the missing steps there...
It works well for me, makes it easy to get two things side by side without wasting space.
reply