I mean if your talking about packets, your already one abstraction over the real data Transmission, in wich is noisy. So bits can randomly flip, noise could be interpreted as bits, and bits could get lost. A much larger blast radius

Sure, for many games Riot games / others with kernal level anticheats dont support linux sadly

Imagin i wanted to vibecode a claw machine. I might need a function called openClaw() to release the item. Perhaps im a huge microsoft fan, and use c# Now its OpenClaw()

And suddenly, unexplainably my bill would skyrocket?

The odds of water, being just at the right distance to the sun, etc i guess

Sure we dont know the chance of life emerging, the symbiotic relationship that provides power for cells, chance of multicells etc.

Do you actually believe that? And if yes, why? Just curious

But it can be compared to the relation us and canada currently have lol

I think comparing percentages inst quite fair, considering you have only two choices in the us, compared to the spectrum of choices un germany.

Wouldnt a fair counter argument be, that llms have been trained on way less fu ctional code though?

Like they are trained on a LOT of js code -> good at js Way less functional code -> worse performance?

You can write functional-style code in many languages, as I have in JS and occasionally Python to great benefit.

For sure. I write functional style code in C# but it is not the same thing as writing OCaml or F#.

That's a very fair point. There are some publications showing lower performance for languages with less training data. I imagine it also applies to different paradigms. Most training code will be imperative and of lower quality.

The counterpoint is that you will learn jank.

If you started early webdev, you learned lots of tricks, that dont benefit a modern webdev. E.g soap, long polling, the JsonP workaround... and so on

Many of the Llm frameworks will be seen simular. Mcp is already kinda heading in the obsolete direction imo, as skills took over

I’ve learned a lot of stuff that don’t really benefits me right now, but now and then I encounter a situation that made me happy that I did. It may never happens for some, but at the time, I was probably happy learning it.

But there’s some stuff that I don’t bother explore in depth because my time is finite and I don’t really need it. And anything LLM tooling is probably easier than a random JS framework. Vim’s documentation is probably longer than cursor’s.

I dont know anything about neurosience But if dreaming is related enouth to visual perception, maybe a dream recorder might be somewhat possible

Edit, reading the github description, which i should have done sooner, hints at dreams.

Every researcher working on this should be required to watch Until the End of the World.