Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vahji's commentslogin


Ah well. If the absolutely not politised Time magazine has placed her as one of the 100 most influential people in the world, then the guy you replied to is a dork. No questions asked! ;P


Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments to Hacker News?

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18646781 and marked it off-topic.


Look at the other people on the list this year. Donald Trump. Cardi B. Hugh Jackman. Satya Nadella. Sean Hannity. Jacinda Ardern. Elon Musk. Oprah Winfrey.

You can argue about the exact selection of people. You can say that Time is 'politicised'. But this is clearly a list of people who are very well known.

It's not embarrassing to admit that you had a blind spot about a particular author, musician or politician. But it is a bit silly to then go on to claim that since you haven't heard about them, they can't be that famous after all.


I live in the EU, which is quite Americanized by any standard, and I'd bet nobody around me would recognize the name of Sean Hannity (or Nikki Haley, another name on the 2016 list). That list just seems hopelessly parochial to me.


It's a list of influential people, not most famous. Knowing who they are I'd say you could reasonably put both on such list.


What's Nikki Haley's influence on the world?


Being the US representative to the UN, I imagine she helped delay action on climate change and things like that.


She's only been the ambassador to the UN since 2017, yet she appears in the 2016 list.


Man, Trump really makes the years seem longer...


I live in the EU and know the cancer that Sean Hannity is. The global village is reality.


I live in the EU too and the only name that anybody would recognise there is Donald Trump because they spend all day on the telly telling us how evil he is. Also Hugh Jackman if you like his movies.


That's a list of eight names, of which I only recognize four (Trump, Jackman, Musk and Winfrey).

I think the problem is that the world is much more fragmented than we assume it is.


You've probably heard of Satya Nadella on HN, he's the CEO of Microsoft


I probably read a few stories that must have included his name, but somehow it never registered.


If they talk evil about something I don't like, that's cool and genuine. If they talk good things about something I don't like, now let me be a cynic here


As a poor person who's always been surrounded by poor people, you are wrong.

Poor and less educated people know nothing about nutrition and don't have the money to buy good food.

When you don't have the money you are forced to fill up with cheap calories like bread, rice, pasta, sugar, etc.


>Poor and less educated people know nothing about nutrition and don't have the money to buy good food.

In societies with traditional agriculture and village culture, they don't have to "know about nutrition". Their traditional recipes and ways of eating are healthier, and cheaper.

That's not an absolute rule, but that's exactly the case with Mediterranean diet for one.

>When you don't have the money you are forced to fill up with cheap calories like bread, rice, pasta, sugar, etc.

Some of which is fine. The healthier people in Japan eat a lot of rice, and bread is mighty fine too, as are noodles etc.

Sugar and highly refined breads are recent inventions. They poor people in Italy pre-70s would hardly have much sugar in their meals except from natural sources (tomatoes etc, not refined). No fast-food and crappy supermarket tv-diner style food either. People cooked religiously.

Also the poor masses in Italy etc were traditionally not destitute (e.g. developing world-like). Just poor. They could still afford basic meals, and had strong family support.


Nothing unhealthy with bread, rice, pasta...

In Sicily, as that is the example given, people are poorer than the European average and significantly poorer than the American average. Yet they have a healthier diet.

The issue of unhealthy diets in the US/Europe is not so much poverty but a culture of junk food and not knowing better.


In the US, absolutely. In other countries, not so much.


Being transparent about pricing is working against you. If I want to pay $54 for a book and I know only $0.77 are going to you, I'm simply not going to buy it.

The production costs might be reasonable, but $20+ to Amazon just for existing? Fuck that. I mean I use Amazon when I know their margins are razor thin (for most things they are), but in this case, big nope here.


The PDF is $10 on Google Play, DRM-free. A quick search shows that Google pays out about half of the selling price.

Doesn't beat having a paper book though, if that's your thing.


> The PDF is $10 on Google Play, DRM-free.

Also watermark-free?


Funny, it's 2000 JPY in Japan. Which is 17.7 USD. Why the +75% Markup for Japan on Google Books?


The US store has the normal price at $17 and marked as on sale at $10. So the normal price matches with conversion about right.


The price in Denmark matches the price in Japan, so it looks like pricing is similar.

Since the book doesn't launch until Monday, there is also a prerelease price that is a few dollars lower.


The price in France shows the ongoing sale: 10,56€ instead of 15,09€.


Does DRM free mean you get to download an epub, or just that the inaccessible files on my phone will be less encrypted?


Good to see actionable and realistic advice for women posted on HN.


What is wrong with you?


Let's be charitable and assume that it was sarcasm.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Believing in evil is the privilege exerted by those who've lived a life of righteousness or, at least, have tried their best.


I happen to have tried my best at that so far and I think this line of thinking is mostly an excuse not to develop empathy and show compassion.


Most Android One phones tick none of those boxes except maybe for the headphone jack.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: