> $1500 per month on personal api use

Dude... whose going to tell him ?

I think you severely underestimate how much tokens people use today. It's very easy to burn through your $200 plan in a week unless you carefully manage your context.

That OpenClaw et-al are against ToS to use with a Max plan?

tell him what? it's legitimate use.

I have max, I kept hitting usage limits. I have 4 projects that I will code in parallel, so while one agent is working, I spin up other agents to complete things. Most of my effort now is designing agile roadmaps with specifications, epics, sprints and implementation cards (using AI to create it, then reviewing it), so the Agents have a massive, detailed roadmap. I review code but I also built a framework where much of the code is generated by templates not the model itself so the review is mostly cursory.

Many of us have both Max and use extra-usage

There are other valid use cases than war for AI.

Of course there are. But once it exists, a technology will be used for all purposes. The choice is in the making, anything else is virtue signaling.

One second, I have to go turn my stove off. It could be used to start a forest fire.

Not all products will get abused, there’s better tools already (like matches/lighters/etc) or there’s just no good abusive use cases. Some products are just begging to be abused. You can’t really tit for tat with a household appliance here, these straw men aren’t of the same planet.

That is not analogous to this petition.

Very few. Most use is a pure negative for society.

Then start your own company where you control the direction of the products. All these people make millions and only speak up after they are set for life.

War will be a comparatively honest use of this technology compared to how the likes of Google will monetize it going forward.

Canada is not as good as Europe when it comes to be out of reach of the US

Go Mistral !

It's funny? I liked it.

Funny is subjective, I should just have moved on and ignored this but I couldn't help myself, this is so irritating.

It's a prompt that makes an LLM turn iuqefxygn9urg0fh1 into a little Godot game. It's like a slot machine with no payoff, and the dog component is slapped on top of it and makes no difference whatsoever in the project.

> It's a prompt that makes an LLM turn iuqefxygn9urg0fh1 into a little Godot game. It's like a slot machine with no payoff, and the dog component is slapped on top of it and makes no difference whatsoever in the project.

Right, but it also has a "modern art" vibe to it that is fun. Silly, but fun. I think it's more about the initial prompting and feedback loop, the dog itself could have been replaced by /dev/random.

"Hacker curiosity" and "intelectual stimulation" are also subjective, but that's what HN is supposed to be about.

It seems to me a case of the blog post title inspiring the project, instead of the other way around. But I am particularly curmudgeonly today.

That's ok. To be honest I had to suppress a similar feeling when I noticed the dog is just an entropy generator.

But then I realized I find this kind of whimsy article more fun than a lot of what gets accepted unquestioningly here on HN. It seems light hearted and done in good fun, and it's engineering-related, so no harm done.

It's funny because vibe coders and AI artists think the slop they generate is no less the product of their intellect and talent than with human professionals, but really they're doing little more than stirring the entropy pool in a magic box with terabytes of stolen valor from better more talented people. They're no more an "artist" or "game developer" using AI than this dog is.

Isn't it the case for all big enough tech companies operating in the US ?

You described how AntiGravity works natively.

Why ?

To me at least it reads funny because when I think of CSS I think of the language itself and not the accompanying tools that are then running the CSS.

Saying "Markdown has a CVE" would sound equally off. I'm aware that its not actually CSS having the vulnerability but when simplified that's what it sounds like.

Funny you'd mention that, when Notepad had a CVE in it's markdown parsing recently.

A crowd playing chess can absolutely not beat a top chess player.

Yea in fact this thing has been done before multiple times as exhibitions (Kasparov vs 50k, Carlsen vs 132k, etc).

And yea, no surprise, the masses do not win. Even when in the latter case, a huge chunk of the 132k was obviously using stockfish cranked to the gills (though the did get a draw out of it?).

The crowd elected Donald Trump -- twice.