row access counters in memory controller would solve this problem - too many accesses between refresh cycles -> force refresh cycle for that particular row/potentially affected rows
It may only have had 128 Bytes of RAM, but it used 4K ROM cartridges, even more than that if the cartridge used bank switching. So Atari 2600 programmes had quite a bit more room to fit inside.
IIRC, early cartridges only had 1 or 2k - the 4k was a limit for a while, but I don't think they all shipped with 4k in the beginning (cost savings). IIRC there was a trick later to allow for 8k cartridges (Pitfall II was 8k, I think, but memory may be failing me).
If you want to base your life around the results of single, small scale studies, that's your choice. But I've seen too many studies that seemed impressive, but when people set out to replicate the the study, they failed to get the same results. This is not rare, it happens frequently.
Before I went into medicine, I too might have missed the point I was making, which is that eating less almost certainly reverses the vast, vast majority of type 2 diabetes. I mean, within a day.
Americans eat so much they think overeating is normal. Bariatric patients (morbidly obese people getting their stomach essentially amputated, see Roux-en-Y) are generally told to fast for 24 hours prior to surgery. Their glucose levels before surgery are often normal, for the first time in decades.
The association between food intake and obesity is far, far stronger than cigarettes and lung cancer, even stronger than Hep B and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Asserting that eating less (and I do mean significantly less) needs to be studied more is like saying we should hold off on parachute use until more studies are done.
The lesson here is don't commit crimes, especially not those that involve risk of death. Which, given the abundance of legal firearms, is quite likely. Thus circling back to don't commit the crimes.
There are three paragraphs in the article discussing that photo and the surrounding controversy. It would have been annoying to make the reader have to leave the article to actually see the photo.
That photo was unremarkable when the album was released, and was in shop windows everywhere. It's hardly erotic -- c'mon, it's an 11 year old!
[edit: I re-read the part of the article, and I don't remember record shops freaking out, which I surely would have heard about at the time. Even the company that sent out albums unasked-for to household sent it out]