Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

New Scientist has been uncritical gee-whiz garbage since at least the 90s.

It might have been before that, but I lacked the analytical skills to notice.



Yes, even at school aged 14 I was told that if I wanted to really learn about science I should read Scientific American in preference to New Scientist.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: