Skipping discussion about "actual security": vendor lock-in & network effects. None of my peers uses Signal for everyday communication. Quite a few use Telegram, +Telegram channels & conferences, bots, and, well, honestly, it's really quite nice app to use. So, yeah. It's sad.
True. Then again, Telegram really has no encryption at all, since no one uses the secret chats. So he probably meant something like "why not use an app that actually tries to do what it claims to?".
That's why I chose to skip discussion about "actual security" in favor of answering the actual question somebody asked. I agree with your point completely.
I've nothing bad to say about Signal. If it supports all the same features I guess that would be a better choice as their crypto seems to be thoroughly verified. (Disclaimer: I am not a cryptographer.)
Telegram just happen to be what my friends and family standardized on after WhatsApp failed on their stated mission.
Yeah, but when I deny most of those permissions to Telegram it continues to operate exactly as I'd expect (e.g., denying contacts means I need to manually enter anyone I want to contact; when I deny SMS permission I need to manually retype the code I receive in Telegram).
Signal just became broken/a pain in the ass. It's been a while, I just know I couldn't actually get to a point where I could send someone a message without granting it unnecessary permissions so I gave up and uninstalled it.
I can't speak for others, but I use it because I wanted a WhatsApp alternative after they were bought by Facebook. At the time I don't think signal was available yet. Now there's a critical mass of family and friends using telegram and it's a lot harder to move to something else. Besides, your average end user probably doesn't care about FSB spying on them because they have "nothing to hide"