You mean the fact that buried deep inside some test scripts were test targets to test specific URL encoding schemes that only exist on uploads by specific youtube partners (e.g. VEVO) by downloading and discarding less than 1 second of video?
The youtube-dl documentation uses free videos uploaded by youtube-dl developers and by the Linux foundation.
The claims that youtube-dl used RIAA member copyrighted works as examples in their docs are false.
You mean the fact that buried deep inside some test scripts were test targets to test specific URL encoding schemes that only exist on uploads by specific youtube partners (e.g. VEVO) by downloading and discarding less than 1 second of video?
The youtube-dl documentation uses free videos uploaded by youtube-dl developers and by the Linux foundation.
The claims that youtube-dl used RIAA member copyrighted works as examples in their docs are false.