> We’re talking about banning the President of the United States, who although he lost just won 5 million more votes than Obama in 2008.
No, it's a ban on baseless claims of massive electoral fraud. Coverage of the President is still allowed.
I have absolutely no idea why you reference Obama in this.
Yes, there's still active litigation. But there is yet to be any notable evidence of anything approaching serious, let alone widespread, wholesale electoral fraud.
No, it's a ban on baseless claims of massive electoral fraud. Coverage of the President is still allowed.
I have absolutely no idea why you reference Obama in this.
Yes, there's still active litigation. But there is yet to be any notable evidence of anything approaching serious, let alone widespread, wholesale electoral fraud.