> a better concept of legitimacy would define it as flowing out of how you use the property
Why, then, do you argue that the Soviet people's loss of the property was not adequately compensated? If legitimacy is based on usage rather than how ownership occurred, why do you complain about how ownership came about? The statement that privatization is theft is a direct comment on the process of ownership transition!
One can certainly make an internally consistent philosophical system based on public or communal ownership. I just don't think you've presented one.
Why, then, do you argue that the Soviet people's loss of the property was not adequately compensated? If legitimacy is based on usage rather than how ownership occurred, why do you complain about how ownership came about? The statement that privatization is theft is a direct comment on the process of ownership transition!
One can certainly make an internally consistent philosophical system based on public or communal ownership. I just don't think you've presented one.