In a way you're agreeing with me. You're pointing out how hard it is to find what's true, and the obvious answer to me seems - better science.
Have the DNA sent to 3 separate labs to test blindly against a control (blind tests are a huge component of the scientific method), require consensus from all 3 labs.
Modern scientific method also was the solution to "phrenology" (skull shape).
At least I assume you're not arguing all scientific evidence in court should be inadmissible?
Have the DNA sent to 3 separate labs to test blindly against a control (blind tests are a huge component of the scientific method), require consensus from all 3 labs.
Modern scientific method also was the solution to "phrenology" (skull shape).
At least I assume you're not arguing all scientific evidence in court should be inadmissible?