To me it communicates a commitment that they'll never have any significant break... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		bryanlarsen on March 24, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Gnome 40 To me it communicates a commitment that they'll never have any significant breaking change ever again without changing their name, fork style.

npteljes on March 24, 2021 | [–]

Yeah like how Firefox got rid of XUL extensions in version 57.

grumpyprole on March 24, 2021 | [–]

An insignificant breaking change is still a breaking change; and over time they build up. This may explain why so many developers have been unhappy with GTK3.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact