> The results are... surprising, to say the least.
Well, are they? I always thought that people will try stuff in a "safe harbor" which they cannot try or should do somewhere else. So I always expect these sandboxes to be full of nsfw stuff.
And people might not understand that their stories will influence the story of others, so...
> And people might not understand that their stories will influence the story of others, so...
They don't. Pretty much all large-scale AI models separate inference/content generation from training. What you use is the frozen version which doesn't update unless its creators retrain it. And if they retrain then it's their choice which data to use for retraining, there's no need to restrict the generated output.
Yeah not surprising at all. Give any sandboxy tool for free to a bunch of anonymous internet users and you can be sure it'll mostly be used for these things.
I mean, even reddit is full of nsfw, explicit, borderline subs with millions of active users
Well, are they? I always thought that people will try stuff in a "safe harbor" which they cannot try or should do somewhere else. So I always expect these sandboxes to be full of nsfw stuff.
And people might not understand that their stories will influence the story of others, so...