Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder how many people getting upset by this are also advocating for fire alarm drills to be removed because "they waste precious resources"?

Emotion definitely overriding people's logic abilities here.



If a researcher starts pulling fire alarms of random buildings, they will face felony charges.


That's not how fire alarm drills work though. That's how fire alarms work.

In this situation, the "researcher" is the person conducting the drills. Which are way more frequent than these emails.


Without the permission of the property owner, conducting a fire alarm drill is no different than pulling the fire alarm.


>That's not how fire alarm drills work though.

You seem to be stuck on this part still.


Stuck on what?

It's your analogy, that the research in question is similar to fire alarm drills, that the researcher is analogous to the people who conduct the drill. I'm merely pointing out, that one cannot randomly conduct fire alarm drills on properties that don't belong to them.

The researchers don't own the websites, and they certainly don't own the internet. What entitles them to conduct the "drill"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: