Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is this like when Google started throwing off massive amounts of money, and Larry and Sergei were like, "I dunno, let's solve aging"?


Let’s hope so. Not enough of this in the world:

“We choose to do these things not because they are easy but because they are hard”

But I’d be happy with a little Bell Labs at a few more companies


More like:

“We choose to do these things not because they are easy but because they are profitable”


Hum... That's clearly not the case.

That's why there isn't a lot of it around.


There are a lot of things that would be profitable, that are held back by either belief that they can't be done or by failure of imagination on their ramifications. Or because people profit from the status quo remaining unchanged.

Non-scientific example: I just read The Box, a history of container shipping. It's remarkable how many transportation incumbents tried to put the kibosh on containerization because they believed it was either not practical or not profitable.

In the end containerization hurt many existing power structures, but it reinvented global commerce and opened unfathomable financial doors for the world as a whole, creating financial empires that were impossible before.


They would have to spend a LOT more to go bell labs. Until now they spend way too little to achieve anything. And for companies like Google have real managers for those groups instead of people only good at optimizing metrics.


Bell Labs is a good example of Icarus syndrome, I'd say they're doing that just fine.


I wonder if the Google Graveyard is full of things that proved to be too hard?


Makani is a fantastic documentary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd_hEja6bzE


And it was a resounding success! (Not)


It was a resounding success for Google's brand perception among job applicants.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: