Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

All of my layoffs had post termination pay to satisfy federal and state law. HR stressed that we were on salary (without working) during the termination period and that leaving would negate benefits. Once this period ended, there were usual benefits like n weeks per year of employment. Blatantly ignoring the rules just invites lawsuits and weakens em’s position.

Sux how rules and established norms of behaviour restrict one’s actions.



The leaked termination notices are indicating that the fired employees will get post termination pay. See, for example, https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1588586560986882048/photo...


Just curious which state was that where they had to give severance? I'm in a US state that does not require anything after termination.


WARN is Federal, but for you to see benefits, the layoff has to meet strict requirements. It’s things like closing an entire site, laying off 33% of employees, 500+ employees, etc.


Mass and Kansas. I can’t say whether the state required additional payments above what’s legally required (60 day notice) but they needed to give something to get people to sign things like termination agreements and non disclosures. Having just been laid off, they weren’t all that willing to be nice and all that.

If you want to be a jerk, that influences future hiring chances both ways. Most companies expect to need to hire at some point in the future.


There is the WARN act which is a federal law. But that only applies to larger companies and mass layoffs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: