Was looking to make something like this, but glad its out there already. The real value though would be to make the app aware of furniture and lighting inventories and cost of paint and whatever else goes into a room. Then after generating in a style, maybe you can say "same thing but cheaper options".
Then you haven't been following the recent developments of stable diffusion. It is mind blowing how good the quality gets if you are using stable diffusion + ControlNet.
I guess the reason this particular example does not work is that a descriptive prompt is missing and / or functionality like inpaint is not available in the process. You can easily fix most of (all?) the artifacts using inpaint.
Stable Diffusion is amazing, but I've never seen it reliably generate realistic hands. The examples in the ControlNet repo show a chef in the kitchen with 6 fingers.
Yes you can. Came out a few days ago. Open pose has already support for it. You can not only render realistic hand and feet but also customize the hand gestures. There is a blender plug-in which let's you position your character pose including hand gestures in 3D and then render the needed controlnet masks. It works amazingly well.
i've been watching and i just haven't drunk the kool-aid. there are things that are just off about the results, but i'm stable enough to not be diffused by the hype.
I guess you can always hate on things which aren't production ready yet. Considering the progress made in the last month's and the speed things keep improving it will most certainly have impact on how the industry works.
That being said, why are we only talking about stable diffusion. What about openai whisper? I have never used a better speech to text software and it is multilingual.
This is a good start, but it’s unfair to call this a clone. The generated images are filled with strange artifacts that you don’t see when using interiorai’s product.
I meant playing with SD vanilla, you can add LoRA/TI/Dreambooth for custom stuff, but for generics, you need to improve your main pipeline in order to not show bad results.
You can also check aesthetic score of results, or hide results w artifacts etc.
My bet is that as a demo tihs has low steps (cheaper replicate tab), and with a different diffuser (some work better for photoralism than others) and more steps results would already improve greatly
Check out the code, and improve it thats what I meant.
Worse than artifacts, it has things that make zero sense in terms of functionality and placement. Unless we're talking about low-grade fiction (on a budget, where authors can't or won't spend time working out the fine details), interior design is about function, not just nice-looking pictures.
I wanted to express disdain for the couple of minutes I lost while testing it out. I stood up to take a photo of my living room and found the results to be abysmal.
