Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This case is something different. Because everyone reviewed their Arxiv papers and found that there’s no meaningful figure for the resistivity. And even magnetization data was not matched between two Arxiv papers. Now, here is where we are. After these reviews, they never updated their data to solve this issue, but they decided to let other guys do their experiment instead of them. The easiest way to solve this is to plot the resistivity data again on a logarithmic scale. And this takes less than a minute because they have raw data. This is a very uncommon situation in the scientific community.


Both papers were significantly rushed for reasons unrelated to the science aspect of it.

Wait for the peer reviewed paper if you are this concerned about it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: