Unfortunately, we don't have regressions yet. But just to make sure these findings were still valid, we tossed this data into a program that did to make sure the effect remained (it did).
It's no substitute for regressions/ANOVA, but for now here's what Statwing can do: If you add a filter that excludes datapoints below, say, 40 years old. Looking only at folks older than 40, there's no relationship between [neuroticism and age], but the relationship between [neuroticism and preference] remains.
But, point taken. We'll count this as a vote for prioritizing regression. Thanks!
Unfortunately, we don't have regressions yet. But just to make sure these findings were still valid, we tossed this data into a program that did to make sure the effect remained (it did).
It's no substitute for regressions/ANOVA, but for now here's what Statwing can do: If you add a filter that excludes datapoints below, say, 40 years old. Looking only at folks older than 40, there's no relationship between [neuroticism and age], but the relationship between [neuroticism and preference] remains.
But, point taken. We'll count this as a vote for prioritizing regression. Thanks!