Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The papers, however, were specifically looking for mercury that was "lost" during the creation of caustic soda, at plants that literally use tons of mercury for this purpose. That is, the mercury is being added when the HFCS is made, not when the corn is grown. (One paper indicates that the four plants responsible are in GA, TN, OH, and WV.)

Switching to a better caustic soda process should eliminate the detectable mercury, regardless of the proximity to coal plants. And some food producers are doing so; as one of the papers points out: "No mercury was detected in the majority of beverages tested."



Ah, I see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_hydroxide#Manufacture

Wikipedia claims "the membrane cell process is economically the most viable", which does not use mercury.

Also, as shown in my previous links, chloralkali plants (which make caustic soda) pollute a significant amount of mercury (needlessly, in my opinion).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: