0. the paper is by a solo, unknown author

1. the arxiv page has a github link

2. the github project looks like all the other claw spam hitting GitHub and HN

4. the spam problem had already reached arxiv, they are now interconnected

yikes- fair points on being skeptical of arxiv quality, thats a real problem. IMO the content of the paper either holds up or it doesnt regardless of who wrote it

I agree, however the signal-to-noise ratio is the new problem, and there are some quick signals to easily classify some as noise